Hodge v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
Decision Date | 04 March 1924 |
Docket Number | No. 23913.,23913. |
Citation | 261 S.W. 67 |
Parties | HODGE v. ST. LOUIS UNION TRUST CO. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; V. H. Falkenhainer, Judge.
Proceeding by Julia F. Hodge against the St. Louis Union Trust Company, executor of the last will of Mary G. Van Blarcom, deceased, for allowance of claim. Judgment for claimant on appeal from judgment of probate, allowing claim, and executor appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Bryan, Williams & Cave, of St. Louis, for appellant.
Boyle & Priest and G. T. Priest, all of St. Louis, for respondent.
The plaintiff filed in the probate court of the city of St. Louis, a statement of an account as follows:
Estate of Mary G. Van Blarcom to Julia F. Hodge Personal services rendered to Mrs. Mary G. Van Blarcom, beginning in the year 1908 and continuing to the date of her death in 1921.......................... $20,000 00
On appeal from the judgment in the probate court allowing the claim in full, a trial was had in the circuit court resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $20,000, from which the defendant appealed.
Miss Hodge was a relative of Mrs. Van Blarcom. She lived in Bloomington, Ill., and when a child, as early as 1899, began making visits at the home of Mr. and Mrs. Van Blarcom in the city of St. Louis. Mr. Van Blarcom, a prominent banker, and his wife were leaders in social life and gave balls and receptions in honor of the plaintiff. They were very fond of her and made a joint will in which they made a provision of $15,000 for her, contingent, however, on the prior death of their only child, Frederick, whose mind was disturbed, and who finally became insane. The death of Mr. Van Blarcom in August, 1908, together with her son's malady, so profoundly affected Mrs. Van Blarcom that she ceased her social activities and thereafter, until her death in March, 1921, saw only a few people—Miss Hodge, Miss Cummings, Mrs. Gray, Mr. Moloney, Mr. Beardsley, Mr. Gleason, and some servants. From the time of her husband's death until her own death, Mrs. Van Blarcom felt the need of the plaintiff's companionship, and, at Mrs. Van Blarcom's request, the plaintiff frequently "visited at her house, spending as much as four or five months each year with her. Plaintiff also made trips to Washington, D. C., at Mrs. Van Blarcom's request, to see her son who was in an asylum. Mrs. Van Blarcom frequently discussed with her attorney, Mr. Moloney, the making of a provision for the plaintiff. She told him that Miss Hodge's income was meager and "that she wanted Miss Hodge to have out of her interest sufficient to hold her between $100 and $150 per month; she thought she would need that for her personal maintenance." Mr. Moloney testified:
Mrs. Van Blarcom continued to consult her attorney about making a provision for plaintiff until shortly before her death. Mr. Moloney had to go to Washington and deferred the matter until his return, when it was too late; Mrs. Van Blarcom was dying.
The difficulty in making provision for Miss Hodge seemed to be that Mrs. Van Blarcom was unable to set apart to her interest-bearing bonds, as she, Mrs. Van Blarcom, needed the interest as it matured for her own support. Mr. Moloney expected to find the bonds in her safe, marked as plaintiff's property, until he and Miss Hodge went to the bank after Mrs. Van Blarcom's death and found the bonds had not been so set apart.
In the discussions with Mr. Moloney, Mrs. Van Blarcom never mentioned having given anything to plaintiff nor having furnished her clothes or bought anything for her as a present. She several times mentioned reimbursing Miss Hodge for expenditures she had made. Mrs. Van Blarcom kept no cash in her house for fear of being robbed, and did all her business with checks. She never mentioned to Moloney that she had given checks to Miss Hodge in payment for her services. The witness, Moloney, continued:
Miss Cummings was intimate with the Van Blarcom household from 1898 until Mrs. Van Blarcom's death. She testified in part:
Mrs. Gray, an old friend of Mrs. Van Blarcom's testified:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lampe v. Franklin American Trust Co.
... ... not have said instructions before it for review. Rule 15, ... Supreme Court; St. Louis v. Realty Co., 48 S.W.2d ... 938; Bellis v. Modern Woodmen, 49 S.W.2d 1059; ... Poindexter v ... plaintiff in the probate court ... In the ... printed form the "Union National Bank" appeared ... both as the payee and as the place of payment, printed in ... larger ... 1094, 295 S.W. 563; In re ... Trautmann's Estate, 300 Mo. 314, 254 S.W. 286; ... Hodge v. St. Louis Union Trust Co. (Mo.), 261 S.W ... 67; Rice v. Waddill, 168 Mo. 99, 67 S.W. 605; ... ...
-
Wells v. Davis
... ... Lusk v ... Ellison, 271 Mo. 463, 473; Fuchs v. St. Louis, ... 167 Mo. 620, 645; American Brewing Assn. v. Talbot, ... 141 Mo ... express trust; and not by virtue of his appointment as such ... administrator, but ... ...
-
Maness v. Graham
...of O'Harver on that ground by taking his deposition before respondent took the deposition she introduced in evidence. Hodge v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 261 S.W. 67; Bush v. Block, 193 Mo.App. 704, 187 S.W. Rice v. Waddill, 168 Mo. 99, 67 S.W. 605; Alexander v. W. O. W., 193 Mo.App. 411, 1......
-
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Ryan
... ... Louis DistrictJune 8, 1943 ... ... Appellant's Motion for ... Bank ... of Camden Point (Mo. App.), 141 S.W.2d 86; Hodge v ... St. Louis Union Trust Co. (Mo.), 261 S.W. 67; Rock ... v. Keller, ... ...