Hodges v. Hodges
Decision Date | 09 October 1946 |
Docket Number | No. 234.,234. |
Citation | 39 S.E.2d 596 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | HODGES . v. HODGES. |
Appeal from Superior Court, Harnett County; Clawson L. Williams, Judge.
Action by Mrs. Hester Hodges against Zola Hodges for alimony without divorce. Alimony pendente lite and counsel fees were awarded, and defendant appeals assigning error. On defendant's motion to dismiss the action.
Action dismissed.
Civil action instituted by the plaintiff for alimony without divorce, as provided in G.S. § 50-16.
Pursuant to notice, the plaintiff made application to his Honor for a subsistence allowance and counsel fees pending the trial and final determination of this cause. At the hearing on the application, the defendant moved to dismiss on the ground that the action, according to the pleadings of the plaintiff, was brought prematurely. Motion denied.
Alimony pendente lite and counsel fees were awarded. Defendant appealed to the Supreme Court, assigning error.
Wellons & Canaday, of Smithfield, for plaintiff.
Neill McK. Salmon, of Lillington, and J. R. Young, of Dunn, for defendant.
The defendant now moves in this Court, to dismiss the action on the ground that the Court is without jurisdiction, for the reason that the complaint filed in this cause is not verified as required by G.S. § 50-16.
The appellee admits the complaint is not verified, but insists that a verification of the pleadings in an action for alimony without divorce is not required by the statute.
In G.S. § 50-16, it is provided "In actions brought under this section, the wife shall not be required to file the affidavit provided in § 50-8, but shall verify her complaint as prescribed in the case of ordinary civil actions." We hold that this provision is mandatory as to the verification but relieves the wife of the necessity of filing the affidavit required by G.S. § 50-8, and substitutes therefor the form prescribed for the verification of pleadings in ordinary civil actions. Moreover, this Court held in Cowles v. Hardin, 79 N.C. 577, where a statute directs that the complaint "shall be sworn to as in other actions", the want of a proper verification is a fatal defect, for which judgment will be arrested. And Stacy, C. J., said, in speaking for the Court in Padgett v. Long, 225 N.C. 392, 35 S.E.2d 234, 235:
It is apparent that the able Judge who heard this matter below was inadvertent to the fact that the complaint was not verified. It appears from the record that the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Carpenter v. Carpenter
...128 N.C.108, 38 S.E.296; Hopkins v. Hopkins, 132 N.C.22, 43 S.E.508; Clark v. Clark, 133 N.C.28, 30, 45 S.E. 342; cf. Hodges v. Hodges, 226 N.C. 570, 39 S.E.2d 596. But, 'When the proper affidavit is made, the court acquires jurisdiction of the cause. ' Kinney v. Kinney, 149 N.C. 321, 63 S.......
- Hodges v. Hodges
-
In re Wolfe
...abuse, neglect, and dependency action because statutorily required initiating petition was defective); see also Hodges v. Hodges , 226 N.C. 570, 570–71, 39 S.E.2d 596, 597 (1946) (holding court lacked jurisdiction to enter order in alimony action because statutorily required initiating comp......
-
Williams v. Williams
...II, § 10, Const.1868 (modified and continued in Art. II, § 24(l)(m) and 24(4), Const. 1970); Schlagel v. Schlagel, Supra; Hodges v. Hodges, 226 N.C. 570, 39 S.E.2d 596. In enacting G.S. § 50--16.1 et seq., effective 1 October 1967, the General Assembly included a provision specifying that t......