Hoffelman v. Frank

Decision Date31 March 1873
Citation52 Mo. 542
PartiesFREIDA HOFFELMAN et al., Respondents, v. GEORGE FRANK, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

Thomas S. Espy, for Appellant.

Appellant filed an elaborate brief, but it is necessarily omitted here, because the Court does not pass upon the points discussed therein.

WAGNER, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the Court at General Term dismissed the appeal taken from the judgment at Special Term, and the defendant has prosecuted his appeal to this Court. Upon looking into the record, we find that there is no bill of exceptions that we can notice. The motion for a new trial was overruled on the 13th day of October, 1871, and time during the term was granted to file the bill of exceptions, and afterwards two extensions of time were given for filing the same; the first till December 30, 1871, and the second till January 1st, 1872. But the Bill was not filed till the 26th day of January 1872, being twenty-five days after the time stipulated. It was then filed without any authority whatever, and we cannot therefore notice it. Hence there is nothing in the record to review.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

The other Judges concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Miller v. St. Louis R.R. Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • 9 Abril 1878
    ...Pollock, 58 Mo. 161; Mentsing v. Railroad Co., 64 Mo. 25; Riddlesberger v. McDaniel, 38 Mo. 138; Howes v. Holmes, 2 Mo. App. 81; Hoffelman v. Frank, 52 Mo. 542; Dale v. Patterson, 63 Mo. 98; Wright v. Shea, 55 Mo. 70; The State v. Smith, 44 Mo. 112; Tilford v. Ramsey, 43 Mo. 410; 56 Mo. 503......
  • Bank of North America v. Fletcher
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • 4 Marzo 1884
    ...the cause on the appeal or writ of error. In addition to the preceding cases, see for illustrations of this statement, Hoffelman v. Frank (52 Mo. 542), Dale v. Patterson (63 Mo. 98), Eau Claire Lumber Co. v. Howard (76 Mo. 517). The case of The State v. Broderick (70 Mo. 622), was, in respe......
  • Bank of North America v. Fletcher
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • 4 Marzo 1884
    ......In addition to the preceding cases, see for illustrations of this statement, Hoffelman v. Frank (52 Mo. 542), Dale v. Patterson (63 Mo. 98), Eau Claire Lumber Co. v. Howard (76 Mo. 517). The case of The State v. Broderick (70 Mo. 622), ......
  • City of St. Louis v. Saitz
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • 12 Febrero 1901
    ...... without authority, and will not be considered. [State v. Clark, 119 Mo. 426, 24 S.W. 1011; Hoffelman v. Frank, 52 Mo. 542; State v. Apperson, 115 Mo. 470, 22 S.W. 375; State v. Seaton, 106 Mo. 198, 17. S.W. 169; State v. Britt, 117 Mo. 584, 23 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT