Hoffman. v. Shields

Decision Date31 January 1870
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
PartiesThomas A. Hoffman et al. v. William II. Shields.

1. It is necessary, in a bill to enforce a judgment lien by a surety, where such surety has paid the judgment, that the original judgment creditors, whose judgment he has paid, be made parties. Conway v. Odbert et al, 2 W. Va. Bep., 25.

2. Judgment creditors are necessary parties in proceedings to subject lands, upon which they are liens, to the payment of other judgment liens.

3. An order of publication is given which is held to be insufficient. This cause came from the circuit court of Taylor county. The bill was filed at July rules, 1864. The complainant sought to sell the real estate of the defendant, Thomas A. Hoffman, on account of having paid to John A. Rightmire and Isaac Carder, the amount of a judgment obtained by them on an injunction bond of the defendant Hoffman, in which the complainant was his surety. Rightmire and Carder were not made parties to the bill. It also failed to make all of the other judgment creditors of Hoffman, some of whom were non residents, parties. The order of publication, which was held insufficient against some of the non resident judgment creditors, was as follows:

"William II. Shields, vs. Thomas A. Hoffman, &c.

In Chancery.

Thomas A. Hoffman, &c. J

"The object of this suit is to enforce the liens of certain judgments named in the bill, and to sell said Hoffman's real estate situate in Claysville, in said county. It appears by affidavit that Samuel D. Brady, Wilson Swindler, Bayly Keys, Eobert T. Keys, Edwin B. Bradley, Robert W. Kyle, David Kyle, and John B. Martin, are not residents of this State. It is therefore ordered that said absent defendants do appear here in within one month after due publication hereof, and do what may be necessary to protect their interests in this suit. A copy. Teste: A. Armstrong.

"I, publisher of the 'West Virginia State Journal, ' a weekly newspaper published in the town of Grafton, West Virginia, do hereby certify that the notice, of which the annexed is a true copy, has been published in said paper for four consecutive weeks. Witness my hand this 17th day of October,

It is unnecessary to give further statement, as the above comprises all the points decided by this court. Hoffman appealed to this court.

Hon. John A. Dille, judge of the circuit court of Taylor, presided on the hearing of the cause.

A. F. Haymond for the appellants. C. Boggess for the appellee.

Maxwell, J. * The first ground assigned as error is, that Rightmire and Carder, two of the home defendants,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 cases
  • Williams v. Grant County Court
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • September 19, 1885
    ...not present a proper case for the exercise of equity jurisdiction." This case is in conflict really with Kuhn v. The Board of Education, 4 W.Va. 490 and The Trustees of Clarksburg v. Goff, 5 W.Va. 498, and in reference to these cases President Haymond says, (page 168). " The question of jur......
  • Marling v. Robrecht
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • July 6, 1878
  • Pickens v. Wood
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • March 28, 1905
    ...that Crim cannot enforce the lien of the state judgment for his benefit under the rule laid down in the case of Hoffman v. Shields, 4 W. Va. 490, because the state cannot be made defendant to the suit. It seems to us that this rule cannot be applied where a surety pays a judgment of his pri......
  • Plaintiff v. County Court Of Grant Co..
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • September 19, 1885
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT