Hoffmeister v. McIntosh
| Decision Date | 26 April 1961 |
| Docket Number | No. 2941,2941 |
| Citation | 361 P.2d 678 |
| Parties | Richard L. HOFFMEISTER, Appellant (Plaintiff-Appellant below), v. John McINTOSH, Appellee (Defendant-Appellee below). |
| Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
Moran, Hettinger & Leedy, R. Lauren Moran, Riverton, for appellant.
Spence, Hill, Oeland & Tschirgi, G. L. Spence, Riverton for appellee.
Before BLUME, C. J., and PARKER, HARNSBERGER, and McINTYRE, JJ.
Upon the application of John McIntosh, the owner of ranch land, the Board of County Commissioners of Fremont County entered an order establishing a private road across the adjoining premises of Richard L. Hoffmeister. An appeal to the district court was dismissed on the ground that the matter was not properly before it; and the court thereafter, purporting to act under the authority of § 48-306, W.C.S.1945, c. 181, S.L. of Wyoming, 1953 (now § 24-6, W.S.1957), adjudged that there was necessity for the establishment of the road. The question before us is the propriety of the judgment both as to the dismissal of the appeal from the board and the adjudication of necessity.
Hoffmeister urges that the applicable statutes are §§ 24-92, 24-93, and 24-94, W.S.1957, which deal with the establishment of private roads. McIntosh on the other hand insists that the appeal is governed by § 24-61, W.S.1957, or if not, that the Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 72, 73, and 75, control and in either event that there was no requisite procedure taken to effect an appeal so that the judgment of dismissal was proper.
Obviously, § 24-61 does not govern the appeal since it specifically refers to a 'public road' rather than a private road. Additionally, the context, position of the sections, and the insertion of subheads in the original Act (c. 69, S.L. of Wyoming, 1895) are unmistakable indicia that the legislature intended to prescribe different procedures for the establishment of public roads (which then included national, state, territorial, and county roads) and for the establishment of private roads. 'The intention of the lawmaking body to be gathered from the terms of the statute in the light of the objects and purposes intended to be accomplished is always the controlling factor in the construction of legislative acts.' In re Lambert, 53 Wyo. 241, 80 P.2d 425, 428.
Moreover, in his original application to the board, McIntosh said that he was acting under § 48-331, W.C.S.1945, which is now § 24-92, W.S.1957, the companion section of § 24-94. He cannot at this stage alter his position. The record indicates that there was a compliance by Hoffmeister with the requirements for appeal under § 24-94, which in its germane portion provides:
'* * * Any person aggrieved by the action of the board or as to the amount of damages awarded, may appeal to the district court at any time within thirty days after said road is finally established by said board of county commissioners.'
We now advert to a consideration of the contention that the Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure apply. It might be argued that by a strict interpretation Rule 1 thereof contemplates the procedures established to apply only in courts of record; but all rules must be construed together 1 and perhaps, and McIntosh contends here, Rule 72(e) does apply. Conceding this to be true, we think that there was a substantial compliance with the portions of Rules 73 to 76 not contravened by specific statutes applicable to the facts in this case. We find therefore that the appeal was properly taken and that the district court should have considered the matter on its merits.
Some analysis of § 24-6, W.S.1957, is essential to a determination of the propriety of the decretal portion of the judgment. Subdivision (a) thereof is substantially similar to § 3, c. 69, S.L. of Wyoming, 1895, which related to 'county roads.' Subdivision (b) which came into being as a part of § 2, c. 181, S.L. of Wyoming, 1953, reads:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ford Motor Co. v. Arguello
...and developments in the field of commercial enterprise. In applying the statute such matters are of prime importance. Hoffmeister v. McIntosh, Wyo., 361 P.2d 678, rehearing denied Wyo., 364 P.2d Also, no citation of authority is necessary to support the proposition that the statute, being r......
-
Basin Elec. Power Co-op. v. State Bd. of Control
...572 P.2d 1106, 1115; Seyfang v. Board of Trustees of Washakie County School Dist. No. 1, Wyo., 563 P.2d 1376, 1380; and Hoffmeister v. McIntosh, Wyo., 361 P.2d 678, 679, reh. den.364 P.2d While the legislative declaration of intent and purpose is not binding upon us, it is, nevertheless, wo......
-
Voss' Adoption, Matter of
...to engage further in legal ruminations in the name of construction. This is not a personal or a new view. In the case of Hoffmeister v. McIntosh, Wyo., 361 P.2d 678, 679, rehearing denied, 364 P.2d 823, it was mentioned that the context, position of the sections, and the insertion of subhea......
-
Frank v. City of Cody
...v. City of Casper, Wyo.1976, 551 P.2d 687; Lohman v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Company, Wyo.1974, 525 P.2d 1; Hoffmeister v. McIntosh, Wyo.1971, 361 P.2d 678, reh. den. Wyo., 364 P.2d 823. We additionally observed in Wyoming State Treasurer v. City of Casper, supra, that we must vie......