Hogan v. Herald Co.
| Citation | 58 N.Y.2d 630,458 N.Y.S.2d 538 |
| Parties | , 444 N.E.2d 1002, 8 Media L. Rep. 2567 Michael J. HOGAN, Respondent, v. HERALD COMPANY, Doing Business as Syracuse Herald Journal, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. |
| Decision Date | 05 October 1982 |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals |
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Richard D. Simons at the Appellate Division (84 A.D.2d 470, 446 N.Y.S.2d 836).
COOKE, C.J., dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion.
I agree that plaintiff is a private individual with respect to his defamation claim and that Chapadeau v. Utica Observer-Dispatch, 38 N.Y.2d 196, 379 N.Y.S.2d 61, 341 N.E.2d 569, sets forth the applicable standard by which to measure defendants' conduct. Because plaintiff failed to ma out a prima facie case under Chapadeau, defendants' motion for summary judgment should have been granted and the complaint dismissed. I, therefore, respectfully dissent.
Plaintiff raised no substantial question that defendants had not "acted in a grossly irresponsible manner without due consideration for the standards of information gathering and dissemination ordinarily followed by responsible parties" (Chapadeau v. Utica Observer-Dispatch, supra, at p. 199, 379 N.Y.S.2d 61, 341 N.E.2d 569). The unverified complaint contains mere general, conclusory statements. In the only affidavit submitted in opposition to defendants' motion, plaintiff's father stated that he told the defendant reporter that his son had not been arrested. Uncontradicted, however, were the reporter's sworn statements that the police chief confirmed that plaintiff "had indeed been arrested on a criminal mischief charge" and that the Town Justice told him "that 'the case' was due to be heard in his court at a later date." Also uncontroverted is the reporter's statement that, when contacted by the reporter, plaintiff did not deny that he had been arrested and told the reporter merely "that the arrest 'was all a joke * * * that was taken care of' ".
There is thus no triable issue as to whether defendants acted in a grossly irresponsible manner. The complaint should therefore have been dismissed. In light of this disposition, I find it...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
DiSalle v. P.G. Pub. Co.
... ... From this language, the Post-Gazette attempts to herald the birth of a new definition of actual malice incorporating the concept of rational interpretation into all indirect reporting cases, including the ... , J., dissenting) ("[I]t is not sufficient if the defamation concerns private persons involved in matters of public or general concern."); Hogan v. Herald Co., 84 A.D.2d 470, 477, 446 N.Y.S.2d 836, 842 aff'd, 58 N.Y.2d 630, 458 N.Y.S.2d 538, 444 N.E.2d 1002 (1982) ("Presumably, all ... ...
-
Albert v. Loksen
... ... "Defamation, consisting of the twin torts of libel and slander, is the invasion of the interest in a reputation and good name." Hogan v. Herald Co., 84 A.D.2d 470, 474, 446 N.Y.S.2d 836, 839 (4th Dep't), aff'd on op. below, 58 N.Y.2d 630, 444 N.E.2d 1002, 458 N.Y.S.2d 538 (1982) ... ...
-
King v. Tanner
...is clear from the publication itself". Hogan v. Herald Co., 84 A.D.2d 470, 480, 446 N.Y.S.2d 836 (4th Dept.1982); aff'd. 58 N.Y.2d 630, 458 N.Y.S.2d 538, 444 N.E.2d 1002; Blumenstein v. Chase, 100 A.D.2d 243, 246, 473 N.Y.S.2d 996 (2nd Dept.1984). See Matherson v. Marchello, 100 A.D.2d 233,......
-
Pollnow v. Poughkeepsie Newspapers, Inc.
...100 A.D.2d 233, 237-238, 473 N.Y.S.2d 998; Hogan v. Herald Co., 84 A.D.2d 470, 480-481, 446 N.Y.S.2d 836, affd. 58 N.Y.2d 630, 458 N.Y.S.2d 538, 444 N.E.2d 1002; Maheu v. Hughes Tool Co., 9th Cir., 569 F.2d 459). 3 Since Gertz set only a minimum constitutional standard, the states were, of ......