Holden v. State, 8 Div. 251.
Decision Date | 16 March 1943 |
Docket Number | 8 Div. 251. |
Citation | 31 Ala.App. 132,16 So.2d 203 |
Parties | Edward HOLDEN v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Denied April 6, 1943.
Appeal from Law and Equity Court, Lauderdale County; Raymond Murphy, Judge.
Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Holden v. State, 8 Div. 239, 16 So.2d 203.
Jos. A. Padway, of Washington, D. C., and Merwin T. Koonce and A. A. Williams, both of Florence, for appellant.
Wm. N. McQueen, Acting Atty. Gen., and L. S. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Violating Code 1940, Tit. 14, § 54.
This case, as to the two controlling questions presented by the appeal, is in pari similibus with the cases of Lash v. State 14 So.2d 235, and Threet v. State, 16 So.2d 195, this day decided by this court.
In the said Lash and Threet cases, it was pointed out that an affirmance of the judgments of conviction, respectively, was due to be entered pursuant to an opinion delivered to this court by our Supreme Court. Code 1940, Title 13, Sec. 95.
Upon authority, therefore, of said cases (Lash and Threet), the judgment of the lower court in this case is ordered affirmed.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Raley v. State
...16 So.2d 206 31 Ala.App. 132 Roy RALEY v. STATE. 8 Div. 257.Alabama Court of AppealsMarch 16, 1943 ... Rehearing ... ...
- Stutts v. State, 8 Div. 250.