Holland v. W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage Co.
Decision Date | 16 December 1922 |
Docket Number | (No. 10079.)<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Citation | 248 S.W. 803 |
Parties | HOLLAND v. W. C. BELCHER LAND MORTGAGE CO. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County.
Action by the W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage Company against M. I. Holland. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
C. A. Wright, of Fort Worth, for appellant.
C. S. Arnold, of Fort Worth, for appellee.
This is a suit filed against the appellant by the appellee, as holder and owner of a promissory note and mortgage executed by George Howard and wife to the Southern Trust Company. The note and mortgage were executed June 26, 1916, and were given for and to secure the payment of $1,700, with interest. It was alleged that George Howard and wife subsequently sold the land upon which the mortgage was given, to M. I. Holland, and that in said deal, as a part of the consideration, Holland assumed and promised to pay this indebtedness; that subsequently, the said note and mortgage was assigned and transferred to the appellant here; that through mistake and without consideration the Southern Trust Company executed a release of this mortgage lien; that later Holland sold the land involved, being 100 acres in Bryan county, Okl., to one Marshall, who paid the entire consideration therefor to said Holland. It appears that at the time of the suit both the plaintiff and the defendant below resided in Tarrant county, Tex. Plaintiff sought a judgment against defendant upon the alleged parol assumption by defendant of the incumbrance on the land, made at the time of the purchase of the land by Holland from Howard and wife. The cause was tried before the court, and from a judgment for plaintiff for the amount sued for, the defendant has appealed.
The deed from Howard and wife to Holland is in part as follows:
It cannot be said that in the deed the vendee specifically assumed the payment of these notes, secured by the mortgages, nor is it so contended by appellee. The reliance is placed on the parol assumption alleged to have been given. Howard testified as to this matter as follows:
Holland testified:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McFarland v. Melson
... ... deed of trust on the land, constitutes a part of the ... consideration for the land conveyed by ... the mortgage debt in question is not such an agreement as ... must be in writing, and ... 143; Woodburn v ... Harvey, 107 Kan. 57, 62, 190 P. 620; Holland v ... Belcher Land & Mort. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.), 248 S.W. 803, ... ...
-
McFarland v. Melson
...703; Chaffee v. Hawkins, 89 Wash. 130, 136, 154 Pac. 143; Woodburn v. Harvey, 107 Kan. 57, 62, 190 Pac. 620; Holland v. Belcher Land & Mort. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.), 248 S.W. 803, 806.] The last statement above perhaps should be qualified some. The Hall and the State Ins. Co. cases first cited......
-
Siekman v. Moler
... ... THAT DEED IS SUBJECT TO-LIABILITY OF GRANTEE-ASSUMPTION OF ... MORTGAGE DEBT BY GRANTEE-PAROL AGREEMENT-PROOF-STATUTE OF ... 1 ... that vendor and purchaser orally agreed upon sale of land at ... definite price of $1,750, and that amount of mortgage debt ... Warner, 109 Cal ... 133, 41 P. 868; Holland v. W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage ... Co. (Tex. Civ. App.), 248 S.W. 803; 18 ... ...
-
Yates v. St. Johns Beach Development Co.
... ... alleged assumption of the mortgage debt represented by the ... second mortgage bonds described in the ... Company, as taker of the legal title to the land involved not ... only took such title encumbered with plaintiff's second ... v ... Templeton, 101 Fla. 609, 135 So. 135; Holland v. W ... C. Belcher Land Mortgage Co. (Tex.Civ.App.) 248 S.W ... 803; ... ...