Hollenbeck v. Hall
Decision Date | 15 October 1897 |
Citation | 72 N.W. 518,103 Iowa 214 |
Parties | JAMES HOLLENBECK, Appellant, v. P. E. HALL |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appeal from Cedar Rapids Superior Court.--HON. T. M. GIBERSON Judge,
THE plaintiff alleged in his petition that " Then follows a denial in detail of the statements contained in the letter, the allegations that it was published by mailing copies to persons named, and that plaintiff has been damaged in the sum of five thousand dollars, for which amount judgment is prayed. No special damages are alleged. To this petition the defendant demurred in these words: The demurrer was sustained, and, the plaintiff electing to stand on the ruling, judgment was entered against him for costs, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
J. H. Crosby, H. Rickel, and John T. Christie for appellant.
Chas. A. Clark for appellee.
Conceding the letter to have been published, was it libelous? Our statute defines "libel" to be "the malicious defamation of a person made public by any printing, writing sign, picture, representation or effigy, tending to provoke him to wrath or expose him to public hatred, contempt or ridicule, or to deprive him of the benefits of public confidence and social intercourse." Code 1873, section 4097. "Defamation" is defined by Webster as "the taking from another's reputation." Odgers, in his work on Libel and Slander, says: "Words which produce any perceptible injury to the reputation of another are called defamatory." It is "a false publication calculated to bring one in disrepute. "Cooley, Torts, 193. The derivation of the word leaves no doubt as to its meaning. Was there anything in the letter injurious to the good name of the plaintiff, or tending to bring him into disrepute? It is not dishonorable to be indebted to another, nor is it libelous to publish of another that he owes money. Regina v. Coghlan, 4 Fost. & Fin. 316. To be in debt is very common,...
To continue reading
Request your trial