Hollenbeck v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co.
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Per Curiam |
| Citation | Hollenbeck v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co., 141 Mo. 97, 41 S.W. 887 (Mo. 1897) |
| Decision Date | 25 May 1897 |
| Parties | HOLLENBECK v. MISSOURI PAC. RY. CO. |
The opinion prepared by BURGESS, J., in the Second division of the court, is hereby adopted as the opinion of the majority of the court in banc. The judgment of the circuit court is therefore affirmed, all the judges concurring, except SHERWOOD, J., dissenting, and ROBINSON, J., absent.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
43 cases
-
Bryant v. Kansas City Railways Co.
... ... BRYANT, His Next Friend, v. KANSAS CITY RAILWAYS COMPANY, Appellant Supreme Court of Missouri February 19, 1921 ... Appeal ... from Jackson Circuit Court. -- Hon. O. A ... court-room. Art. 2, sec. 10, Mo. Constitution; Sec. 3862, R ... S. 1909; Boyd v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 236 Mo. 81. (5) ... The verdict in this case is not excessive. Hurst v ... Railroad, ... ...
-
Brannock v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company
... ... ST. LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCO RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant Court of Appeals of Missouri, St. Louis March 8, 1910 ... Appeal ... from Stoddard Circuit Court.--Hon ... facts. [ Hamilton v. Mining Co., 108 Mo. 364, 18 S.W ... 977; Hollenbeck v. Railroad, 141 Mo. 97, 38 S.W ... 723, 41 S.W. 887; Lee v. Railroad, 195 Mo. 400, [147 ... ...
-
Applegate v. Quincy
... ... QUINCY, OMAHA & KANSAS CITY RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant Supreme Court of Missouri, First Division July 10, 1913 ... Appeal ... from Daviess Circuit Court. -- ... Bolt & Nut Company, 245 Mo. 720; ... Clifton v. Railroad, 232 Mo. 708; Hollenbeck ... ...
-
Applegate v. Quincy, O. & K. C. R. Co.
... 158 S.W. 376 ... APPLEGATE ... QUINCY, O. & K. C. R. CO ... Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1 ... June 28, 1913 ... Rehearing Denied July 10, 1913 ... Sturges, 245 Mo. 720, 151 S. W. 966; Clifton v. Railroad, 232 Mo. 708, 135 S. W. 40; Hollenbeck ... ...
Get Started for Free