Hollenbeck v. Post-Intelligencer Co.

Citation297 P. 793,162 Wash. 14
Decision Date09 April 1931
Docket Number22811.
PartiesHOLLENBECK v. POST-INTELLIGENCER CO.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Washington

Department 1.

Appeal from Superior Court, King County; John A. Frater, Judge.

Action by Eunice Hollenbeck against the Post-Intelligencer Company. Judgment sustaining a demurrer, and plaintiff appeals.

Reversed.

Walter B. Allen and L. A. Michelson, both of Seattle, for appellant.

Tanner & Garvin, of Seattle, for respondent.

HOLCOMB J.

A demurrer was sustained to the amended complaint of appellant in an action for libel and slander. Appellant refused to plead further, and the action was dismissed. This appeal resulted.

The amended complaint, omitting formal parts, is as follows:

'That plaintiff is and at all times herein mentioned has been living separate and apart from her husband, from whom she has been granted an interlocutory order of divorce; and that the property and business hereinafter mentioned is and at all times herein mentioned was her sole separate and individual property, and that she is now and at all times herein mentioned was making her home at 1307 Seneca Street, Seattle, Washington.
'That at all times herein mentioned, defendant was and now is a corporation, having its principal office and place of business at Seattle, King County, Washington, and that it is and at all times herein mentioned was engaged in the business of publishing and circulating a certain newspaper called the 'Seattle Post Intelligencer,' which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had a large and general circulation throughout the state of Washington and particularly in and about the city of Seattle.
'That on or about the 1st day of August, 1929, plaintiff became the tenant under written lease, of those certain premises known as No. 1307 Seneca Street, Seattle, Washington, which is situated in what is known as 'First Hill Residential District' in said city of Seattle, and ever since that time, plaintiff, as such owner and tenant, has been residing therein and conducting a rooming and boarding house at said place.
'That on the 6th day of November, 1929, in its issue of said newspaper, the 'Seattle Post Intelligencer' of that day, the defendant published and caused to be circulated throughout the state of Washington and other places and particularly in and about the city of Seattle, a certain false and defamatory article of and concerning the rooming and boarding house owned and operated by the plaintiff at her said home at 1307 Seneca Street, Seattle, which said article as published in said newspaper is as follows:
"Girls Parents Aver Vice Den Lured Minors.
"Prosecutor Colvin Investigates Charge of Attempt to Lead Children Astray.
"On the complaint of irate parents the prosecutor's office yesterday started investigation of a group of men alleged to have misled young Seattle girls on a wholesale scale. With definite information that at least three girls were plied with liquor at 1307 Seneca Street, Deputy Prosecutor R. L. Bartling filed charges of contributing to the delinquency of minors against Jack Vassar, twenty-two, and

Andy Head, thirty. The two were arrested and held in $1,000 bail.

"'From our information we believe other young girls have been taught to drink by Vassar and Head and their friends at this place,' Bartling said.
"Names Withheld.
"He added that much more serious charges might be filed. The names of three of the girls were mentioned in the complaints, but the publication was forbidden by the prosecutor, due to their ages. Clues to the identity and addresses of the girls thought to have visited the rendezvous were in the prosecutor's hands.
"Exposure of the alleged den where the prosecutor believes many were enticed was brought about by the father of one of the supposed victims, Bartling said.
"'The girls range in age from fifteen to eighteen years,' he declared.
"Girl Runs Away.
"'Just how many girls have been taken there, given strong liquor and otherwise led astray is hard to say. But we know there are others than those whose names we have.'
"A party last Saturday night led to the downfall of Vassar and Head, according to Bartling.
"'An acquaintance of the father of one of the girls ascertained she was in the house and told her family,' Bartling said. 'When her father confronted her, the girl ran away from her home. She has since been found at a relative's home.'
"Under questioning by Bartling yesterday, three of the girls told frankly of their visits to the house.'

'That said article was false and untrue in this--that the charges as published in said newspaper article were never made to the prosecuting attorney, or to the defendant or to anyone else prior to their said publication by the defendant; and that the said article as published was and is false and untrue in fact.

'That said article was falsely written, published and circulated by the defendant, of and concerning the plaintiff's home, place of business and herself, and was understood by persons who read the same, to refer to plaintiff's said home, place of business and herself, as the owner thereof.

'That said article was intended by the defendant to lead anyone reading the same to believe that the plaintiff's said rooming and boarding house was in fact a vice den, and those reading said article did conclude and understand that plaintiff's said rooming and boarding house was alleged to be a vice den.

'That said article was intended by the defendant to, and did in effect, charge the operator of said rooming house, to wit ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Holden v. American News Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Washington
    • October 7, 1943
    ...148 P. 774, Ann. Cas.1917B, 442; McKillip v. Grays Harbor Publishing Company, 100 Wash. 657, 171 P. 1026; Hollenbeck v. Post-Intelligencer Company, 162 Wash. 14, 18, 297 P. 793; Ziebell v. Lumbermens Printing Company, 14 Wash.2d 261, 266, 127 P.2d 677. However, each defendant pleaded affirm......
  • Owens v. Scott Pub. Co., 32780
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • May 26, 1955
    ...and Gaffney v. Scott Publishing Co., 35 Wash.2d 272, 212 P.2d 817. One of our cases in classification (b) is Hollenbeck v. Post-Intelligencer Co., 162 Wash. 14, 297 P. 793. (2) Cases in which the admitted facts or the facts found by the court or jury disclosed that, if there was a privilege......
  • Spangler v. Glover
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • June 27, 1957
    ...that he was the one referred to in the publication. Olympia Water Works v. Mottman, 88 Wash. 694, 153 P. 1074; Hollenbeck v. Post-Intelligencer Co., 162 Wash. 14, 297 P. 793. We are aware of the case of Ryan v. Hearst Publications, Inc., 3 Wash.2d 128, 100 P.2d 24, which at first glance mig......
  • Carey v. Hearst Publications, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • December 10, 1943
    ...Pub. Co., supra; Hollenbeck v. Post-Intelligencer Co., 162 Wash. 14, 297 P. 793. In the case last cited, the court said, 162 Wash. at page 19, 297 P. at page 795: '* * * the privilege ends when falsity begins, and if, * * the charge is false, the privilege, if there was one, was therefore e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT