Holliday v. Nolan

Decision Date18 March 1902
Citation67 S.W. 663,93 Mo. App. 403
PartiesHOLLIDAY et al. v. NOLAN et al.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL>
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from St. Louis circuit court; W. C. Douglas, Judge.

Claim by Samuel N. Holliday and others, as trustees, against Phillip J. and John A. Nolan, as executors of William A. Meagher, deceased, for unpaid rent and taxes due under a lease. From a judgment for claimants, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

Hickman P. Rodgers and M. Kinealy, for appellants. S. N. & J. G. Holliday, for respondents.

GOODE, J.

In May, 1880, Gerard B. Allen leased certain premises in the city of St. Louis to Marcus A. Wolff and William A. Meagher, at that time constituting the firm of M. A. Wolff & Co. The lease was for 30 years, at a rental of $700 per annum, plus the payment of all taxes by the lessees. Meagher quitclaimed his interest in the lease to M. A. Wolff in 1884. In 1887 Edward B. Wolff and George P. Wolff took an interest in the business with M. A. Wolff, constituting the M. A. Wolff Real Estate Company. M. A. Wolff afterwards died, and his said two sons continued the business of the firm until 1897, when the former sold out to the latter, who remained on the premises in question, conducting the real estate business, until the lease was forfeited for nonpayment of rent and taxes, to wit, in May, 1899. Meagher died in March, 1900, leaving a will, of which the defendants, Phillip J. Nolan and John A. Nolan, are executors. Gerard B. Allen, the lessor, died in 1887, leaving a will whereby he devised to the plaintiffs, Samuel N. Holliday, George S. Drake, and George L. Allen, as trustees, the premises in question. The aforesaid lease of the said premises provided that any failure to pay the quarterly rent reserved, or any part thereof, when due, or to pay city and state taxes on demand, or any part thereof, within the year the same would become due, or to keep and perform any other of the agreements, covenants, or stipulations in the lease, should create a forfeiture thereof, and a termination of the time for which the premises were let, and that the leased estate should be absolutely void, at the election of the lessor, "at any day or time, however distant, after such failure, by notice in writing to that effect given by said lessor, his heirs, legal representatives, or assigns, to said lessees or their legal representatives, which said notice may be served by delivering a copy or duplicate of such notice to said lessees, or to either of them, or to their legal representatives. But it is further agreed that if the notice of forfeiture be for nonpayment of rent, taxes, or insurance, the said lessees may, by a payment of the same at any time within thirty days after the service of said notice, be reinstated to all their rights," etc., "the same as if no default had been made." After George P. Wolff became the sole occupant of the premises, and sole proprietor of the business of the M. A. Wolff Real Estate Company, he paid the rent promptly to the agent of the trustees of Gerard B. Allen's will, until 1899, when he defaulted in the payment of both the rent and the taxes for 1898 and 1899. The result was that in May, 1899, a written notice was served on him by the trustees under Allen's will, to wit, the plaintiffs, notifying him that on account of his default and breaches in regard to the payment of rent and taxes, and to keep the improvements on the property insured, the said trustees declared a forfeiture of the lease, and of his and every one's else...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Mutual Drug Co. v. Sewall
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 5 Septiembre 1944
    ...of the sublease. Whetstone v. McCartney, 32 Mo.App. 430; Charless v. Froebel, 47 Mo.App. 45; Jones v. Barnes, 45 Mo.App. 590; Holliday v. Noland, 93 Mo.App. 403; Jenkins John Taylor Dry Goods Co., 352 Mo. 660; Geyer v. Denham, 231 S.W. 61; Taylor v. DeBus, 31 Ohio St. 468; Halbe v. Adams, 1......
  • Stubbs v. Mulholland
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 28 Marzo 1902
  • Stubbs v. Mulholland
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 28 Marzo 1902
  • Columbia Brewing Company v. Miller
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 16 Abril 1907
    ... ... 630; ... Welch & Harvey v. Dameron, 47 Mo.App. 221; ... Boettger v. Roehling, 74 Mo.App. 257; Browne v ... Appleman, 83 Mo.App. 79; Holliday v. Noland, 93 ... Mo.App. 403, 67 S.W. 663; Coney v. Laird, 153 Mo ... 408, 55 S.W. 96; Est. of Glover & Shepley, 127 Mo. 153, 29 ... S.W. 982; ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT