Holmes v. Commonwealth
Decision Date | 15 February 1927 |
Citation | 291 S.W. 383,218 Ky. 314 |
Parties | HOLMES v. COMMONWEALTH. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Lee County.
Virgil Anderson Holmes was convicted of murder, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.
E. B Rose, of Beattyville, Frank S. Ginnocchio, of Lexington, and Carter D. Stamper, of Beattyville, for appellant.
Frank E. Daugherty, Atty. Gen., and Moorman Ditto, Asst. Atty Gen., for the Commonwealth.
Virgil Anderson Holmes was indicted in the Lee circuit court for the willful murder of his wife, Louisa Holmes, by driving running, and directing an automobile in which she was sitting over a steep, high cliff, thereby hurling her with great force to the ground below and causing her death. The defendant pleaded not guilty. On the second trial of the case he was found guilty of murder and his punishment fixed at life imprisonment. He appeals.
The testimony for the commonwealth is in substance as follows: On November 10, 1925, the defendant with his wife and two children in a Ford car drove out of Beattyville on the Irvine pike. As they went along they passed, a mile or two out, R G. Riley and wife, who were riding out the pike on horseback. Soon after this, and before Riley reached a cliff known as Bear Track, he saw Holmes coming down the road toward him, walking a very curious walk. When he got near them Riley said, "What is the matter with you?" He commenced to try to tell him, made two or three staggers at it. He stretched out his hand and said, "Lord, wasn't that awfully?" Riley said, "What is awful; did the car run over you?" he said, "No; I was putting a chain on the car and told her to back the car up, and it went over the cliff with her." He fell down in the road. Riley got down to him and shook him and said, "Your wife and children is over that cliff; I will go to them; you go to that next house and call for help." Holmes went on down the road, as directed by Riley, to get further help, and the next man he came to thus states what occurred when he got to his house:
They all then went back up to the cliff and found that the wife and one of the children were dead; the other child was not seriously hurt. The car was a complete wreck, as the cliff was about 90 feet high and precipitous. The county judge was introduced by the commonwealth. He says that he asked the defendant why he drove into Bear Track and that he answered as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Watkins v. Commonwealth
...v. Com., 158 Ky. 768, 166 S.W. 254; Sipes v. Com., 221 Ky. 603, 299 S.W. 183; Evans v. Com., 221 Ky. 648, 299 S.W. 553; Holmes v. Com., 218 Ky. 314, 291 S.W. 383; v. Com., 219 Ky. 177, 292 S.W. 799; and in perhaps other cases, we have reversed the judgment for insufficiency of the evidence.......
-
Tarkaney v. Commonwealth
...v. Com., 149 Ky. 42, 147 S.W. 764; Saylor v. Com., 158 Ky. 768, 166 S.W. 254; Sipes v. Com., 221 Ky. 603, 299 S.W. 183; Holmes v. Com., 218 Ky. 314, 291 S.W. 383; v. Com., 219 Ky. 177, 292 S.W. 799; York v. Com., 235 Ky. 751, 32 S.W.2d 331; Slone v. Com., 236 Ky. 299, 33 S.W.2d 8; Moore v. ......
-
Miller v. Commonwealth
...venire from another county, rests largely in the discretion of the trial court (Stamp v. Com., 200 Ky. 133, 253 S.W. 242; Holmes v. Com., 218 Ky. 314, 291 S.W. 383), and where the petition for a change of venue is accompanied by the supporting affidavits, but controverted, this court gives ......
-
Tarkaney v. Commonwealth
...v. Com., 149 Ky. 42, 147 S.W. 764; Saylor v. Com., 158 Ky. 768, 166 S.W. 254; Sipes v. Com., 221 Ky. 603, 299 S.W. 183; Holmes v. Com., 218 Ky. 314, 291 S.W. 383; Forgy v. Com., 219 Ky. 177, 292 S.W. 799; York v. Com., 235 Ky. 751, 32 S.W. (2d) 331; Slone v. Com., 236 Ky. 299, 33 S.W. (2d) ......