Holt's Bakery v. Hutchinson
Decision Date | 03 December 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 70880,70880 |
Citation | 177 Ga.App. 154,338 S.E.2d 742 |
Parties | HOLT'S BAKERY et al. v. HUTCHINSON. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Elton L. Wall, Macon, for appellants.
Dewey N. Hayes, Jr., Dewey N. Hayes, Sr., Douglas, for appellee.
On July 8, 1981, Beatrice Hutchinson suffered an injury to her back and neck as she carried a pan of doughnuts while working at Holt's Bakery. She worked until July 21, when she became totally unable to continue, and she remained out of work until her return on August 10. She claimed and received temporary total disability income benefits for the period of time she was out of work, plus medical expenses.
On July 21, Ms. Hutchinson was treated by a physician who signed a "Medical Report" Form WC-18 indicating that the employee had suffered a lower lumbar sprain, had no permanent disability, would not likely need vocational rehabilitation and would be able to return to normal work in about three weeks. No "Final Medical Report" Form WC-20 was filed. The Form WC-18 was filed with the Board on September 9, on which date the insurer filed Form WC-2 showing that temporary total disability payments to Hutchinson had commenced and had been suspended; "Recurring Temporary Total" was typed at the top of the form. Also on this date, the insurer filed Form WC-4 reflecting that the final weekly payment of benefits was made on August 19, 1981. They were designated as the "total" type of wage payment, and medical expenses were also shown as paid. The WC-4 report responded "none" in the box marked "if permanent injury state loss." The forms were signed only by the adjuster. Neither form provided space for Hutchinson's signature.
On October 14, 1983, the employee again ceased to work for the bakery, this time permanently, due to the gradual worsening of her back condition which finally prevented her from continuing. She filed a claim for compensation on February 7, 1984, alleging a new injury on October 14, 1983 and a 20% permanent partial disability rating. The employer and insurer filed a notice to controvert payment of compensation.
At the hearing before the administrative law judge, the parties stipulated that the original accident was on July 8, 1981, with a disability date of July 21, 1981, that the claimant was alleging either a new accident or a change of condition as of October 14, 1983, the last day Hutchinson worked at the bakery, and that the average weekly wage figure would be different from the 1981 accident to the 1983 cessation. The parties further stipulated to the wages for thirteen weeks prior to the October, 1983 incident which were all based on a reduced work week. Ms. Hutchinson claimed the reduction was necessitated by her back condition. Claimant's counsel informed the ALJ that: The employer and the insurer moved to dismiss Hutchinson's claim as too late.
The ALJ issued an award finding that Hutchinson She therefore granted the motion and denied the claim.
On appeal, the Board found that Hutchinson's claim was not time-barred because permanent partial disability payments due her had not been completely paid, that she was due weekly temporary total disability benefits from October 25, 1981 until terminated by law, and that she was due permanent partial disability weekly indemnity benefit payments based on a 20% disability rating to commence upon the completion of temporary total payments and to continue until terminated by law.
The employer and the insurer appealed to the superior court and after a hearing and the submission of briefs, the court affirmed the Board's award, stating: "This ruling is based on a finding that claimant's injury falls under the first category enunciated in Central State Hospital v. James, 147 Ga.App. 308, 248 S.E.2d 678 (1978) whereby aggravation of an injury previously sustained on the job constitutes a 'new accident' as of the date the employee ceases his employment and therefore the two-year statute of limitations for 'change in condition' is inapplicable."
We granted application for discretionary appeal.
1. Appellants assert that the court erred in ruling that Hutchinson in 1983 sustained a "new accident" rather than a "change in condition" as both are defined in Central State Hosp. v. James, 147 Ga.App. 308, 309(1), 248 S.E.2d 678 (1978). The correct characterization of Hutchinson's injury is central to the question of the timeliness of her claim.
In order to better distinguish between old and new injuries, the court in Central State Hosp. v. James, supra outlined three of the frequently occurring situations in the work place: Central State Hosp. v. James, supra at 309, 310(1), 248 S.E.2d 678.
" ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Metro. Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth. v. Reid
...claim. See, e.g., Wet Walls, Inc. v. Ledezma, 266 Ga.App. 685, 688(4), 598 S.E.2d 60 (2004), citing Holts Bakery v. Hutchinson, 177 Ga.App. 154, 159 –161(3), 338 S.E.2d 742 (1985). Cases construing the pre–1990 version of the limitation period are not applicable here.5 See OCGA § 34–9–104(a......
-
City of Poulan v. Hodge
...1; Wesleyan College v. Mains, 207 Ga.App. 562, 428 S.E.2d 577(1993); MARTA v. Ledbetter, supra at 519, 361 S.E.2d 878; Holt's Bakery v. Hutchinson, 160-162, 338 S.E.2d 742. Absent a MMI determination, there can be no legal disability rating so that any "potential" benefits under Holt's Bake......
-
Maryland Cas. Co. v. Walls
...under the original award." Slattery Assoc. v. Hufstetler, 161 Ga.App. 389, 390-391, 288 S.E.2d 654. Accord Holt's Bakery v. Hutchinson, 177 Ga.App. 154, 338 S.E.2d 742. Stated differently, an "initial" claim for workers' compensation cannot be based on a "change in condition" because a "con......
-
AllSouth Stevedoring Co. v. Wilson
...the point that he can no longer continue to perform his ordinary work." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Holt's Bakery v. Hutchinson, 177 Ga.App. 154, 157, 338 S.E.2d 742 (1985). Evidence exists to bring Wilson's injury within the classic definition of a change in condition. A finding o......