Home Ins. Co. v. Southport Terminals, Inc.
| Decision Date | 14 October 1970 |
| Docket Number | 70--471,70--470,Nos. 69--724,69--642,69--646,s. 69--724 |
| Citation | 240 So.2d 525 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
| Parties | The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. SOUTHPORT TERMINALS, INC., Appellee. |
Gary M. Witters, of Allen, Dell, Frank & Trinkle, Tampa, for appellant.
William F. McGowan, Jr., of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tampa, for appellee.
Since 1956 stevedores have been liable to indemnify shipowners sued by the stevedore's employees injured on the job. Ryan Stevedoring Co., Inc. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp., 350 U.S. 124, 76 S.Ct. 232, 100 L.Ed. 133. Thus Ryan gives the injured employee a way around the limitations of the Longshoremen and Harbor Workers Compensation Act, which may be bad law, but we are not the Supreme Court. The risk is one which might well prompt a prudent stevedoring firm to purchase a comprehensive general liability policy, which Southport did.
The policy does not protect Southport against 'liability Assumed by the insured under any contract or agreement except' certain common but irrelevant hold-harmless agreements. What this means is debatable. It is at least arguable that it means that the insurance company is not liable to an insured which gratuitously undertakes to act as surety or which undertakes contractual obligations not arising as a matter of law in the conduct of its business. The cases holding that the exclusion does not apply are numerous and soundly reasoned. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Virginia Engineering Co., 4 Cir. 1954, 213 F.2d 109 (); Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. California Stevedore and Ballast Co., 9 Cir. 1962, 307 F.2d 513; Zidell v. Travelers Indemnity Co., D.C.1967, 264 F.Supp. 496; Annotation, 63 A.L.R.2d 1122.
As Judge Maxwell said in Owens v. Reederi Richard Schroder, Case No. 165945, Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, 'Southport Terminals' liability to the shipowners in this case is not founded upon either a written or oral hold harmless agreement but arises by virtue of Southport's alleged breach of its warranty of workmanlike performance of its stevedoring services.'
If an insurer does not intend to protect an insured stevedore against one of the major risks of its business it should say so in plain language at the time the policy is issued, not after a claim has arisen. Ambiguity is resolved against the insurer. This is simply, as...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Karadis Bros. Painting Co. v. Pennsylvania Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.
...Co., 450 F.2d 1193 (9 Cir. 1971); Abajian v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 232 F.Supp. 710 (D.Vt.1964); Home Insurance Co. v. Southport Terminals, Inc., 240 So.2d 525 (Fla.Ct.App.1970); Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Starrett, 102 Ga.App. 278, 115 S.E.2d 641 (Ct. of App.1960); Board of Trade......
-
Continental Cas. Co. v. Great American Ins. Co., 86 C 3938.
...Great American's Coverage A applied to contracts to indemnify another for employment injury liabilities. See Home Ins. Co. v. Southport Terminals, Inc., 240 So.2d 525 (Fla.App.1970) (employer's liability exclusion does not apply to stevedore's action under admiralty law against shipowner fo......
-
Ranger Insurance Company v. Mathews
...are many cases which so hold. See Harris v. Carolina Life Insurance Company, Fla.1970, 233 So.2d 833; Home Insurance Company v. Southport Terminals, Inc., Fla.App.1970, 240 So.2d 525; Quick v. National Indemnity Company, Fla.App.1970, 231 So.2d 22; Americas Aviation & Marine Insurance Co. v......
-
Ranger Insurance Company v. Algie, 73-1853 Summary Calendar.
...in accord with this principle. Hodges v. National Union Indemnity Co., 249 So.2d 679, 680 (Fla. 1971); Home Insurance Co. v. Southport Terminals, Inc., 240 So.2d 525, 526 (Fla.App.1970); DaCosta v. General Guaranty Ins. Co., 226 So.2d 104, 105 (Fla.1969). Application of this rule of constru......