Home Ins. Co. v. Woods
Decision Date | 01 July 1925 |
Docket Number | No. 3726.,3726. |
Citation | 274 S.W. 520 |
Parties | HOME INS. CO. v. WOODS et al. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Texas County; W. E. Barton, Judge.
Action by the Home Insurance Company against N. W. Woods and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded, with directions.
J. L. Bess, of West Plains, and W. N. Evans, of Houston, for appellant.
This is a suit on an installment note given for fire and tornado insurance premiums. Trial was had before the court and a jury. Verdict and judgment went for defendants, and plaintiff appealed.
The petition is in conventional form. The answer admits the execution of the note, but pleads failure of consideration. This defense is based upon the contention that the policy was never delivered. The answer also contains a counterclaim, whereby defendants seek to recover $15.12, the amount paid when the application was taken. Plaintiff in a reply denied generally the new matter.
The note was for $60.48, dated February 1, 1922. The four installments for $15.12 each were due and payable April 1, 1923, 1924, 1925, and 1026. Plaintiff's evidence was to the effect that the application for the two policies for which the note was given was received and approved, and that the policies were issued and mailed to defendants, who are husband and wife. Defendant N. W. Woods sought, through the bank at Mountain View, a federal farm loan. He kept his "valuable papers" in the bank. June 19, 1922, the cashier of the bank wrote plaintiff as follows:
Again, on August 9, 1922, the cashier wrote plaintiff as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McNeill v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York
...Burdick v. Security Life Assn., 77 Mo.App. 629; Elliott on Insurance, sec. 157; Wolf v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 269 S.W. 705; Home Ins. v. Woods, 274 S.W. 521; Block United States F. & G. Co., 290 S.W. 429; Godwin v. Iowa State Ins. Co., 27 S.W.2d 464. (3) The record is replete with evidenc......
-
McNeill v. Fidelity & Cas. Co.
...Burdick v. Security Life Assn., 77 Mo. App. 629; Elliott on Insurance, sec. 157; Wolf v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 269 S.W. 705; Home Ins. v. Woods, 274 S.W. 521; Block v. United States F. & G. Co., 290 S.W. 429; Godwin v. Iowa State Ins. Co., 27 S.W. (2d) 464. (3) The record is replete with ......
-
DeSalme v. Union Electric Light & Power Co.
...... 112. (d) Because during the entire period in question. plaintiffs occupied the place as a home, and lost no rents. (2) Plaintiffs are limited in their recovery to the damages. claimed in their ... 252 Mo. 510, l. c. 524; Schroeder v. Edwards, 267. Mo. 459, syll. 8, l. c. 486; Home Ins. Co. v. Woods, . 274 S.W. 520; Paddock-Hawley Iron Co. v. Graham, 48. Mo.App. 638, syll. 4; ......
-
Desalme v. Union E.L. & P. Co., 24102.
...McLure v. National Bank of Commerce, 252 Mo. 510, l.c. 524; Schroeder v. Edwards, 267 Mo. 459, syll. 8, l.c. 486; Home Ins. Co. v. Woods, 274 S.W. 520; Paddock-Hawley Iron Co. v. Graham, 48 Mo. App. 638, syll. 4; Denny v. Guyton, 327 Mo. 1030, syll, 23, l.c. 1094-5; Barr v. Nafziger, 328 Mo......