Hooks v. Neill
Decision Date | 18 July 1929 |
Docket Number | (No. 9320.) |
Citation | 21 S.W.2d 532 |
Parties | HOOKS et al. v. NEILL et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Harris County; Walter E. Monteith, Judge.
Action by Charles G. Hooks and others against Robert T. Neill and others, in which defendant named filed a cross-action against the Oxford Oil Company, R. H. Ward, and another. From the judgment, Hooks and the named cross-defendants appeal. Reformed and affirmed.
Gordon O. McGehee and R. H. Ward, both of Houston, for appellants.
Kennerly, Williams, Lee, Hill & Sears, of Houston, and Hill, Smith & Neill, of San Angelo, for appellees.
On the 18th day of November, 1902, Stephen Jackson, who owned 43 acres of land, a part of the Stephen Jackson league, near the town of Sour Lake, Tex., executed a deed wherein it is recited that "for and in consideration of the sum of twelve hundred ($1,200) dollars to me in hand paid by Mrs. M. J. Mackey and Mrs. Dora M. Neill, and C. C. Todd, have granted, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do grant, sell and convey unto the said Mrs. M. J. Mackey and Mrs. Dora M. Neill of San Antonio [here a 1-acre tract of land, a part of the 43-acre tract, is described by metes and bounds], (Italics ours.)
It will be noticed that, while the conveyance recites that C. C. Todd paid a part of the consideration therefor, the land was in fact conveyed to Mrs. Mackey and Mrs. Neill only. On the 29th day of April, 1903, C. C. Todd executed and delivered to Mrs. Mary Mackey a deed, wherein it is recited:
This recital is followed by the habendum and general warranty clauses. Upon the death of Mrs. Mackey, such interest as she owned in the one acre of land became vested in James Mackey, and upon the death of Mrs. Dora Neill such interest in said land as she owned became vested in Robert T. Neill, and his sister, Mrs. Dora Neill Raymond. On the 30th day of July, 1925, James Mackey by special warranty deed conveyed all title and interest he owned in the one acre of land to R. L. Durham, trustee. On the 11th day of August, 1925, Robert T. Neill and Mrs. Dora Neill Raymond by special warranty deed conveyed to R. L. Durham, trustee, all title and interest they owned in the one acre of land, except such as was reserved by the recital in the deed as follows:
On the 2d day of October, 1925, R. L. Durham, trustee, by warranty deed conveyed the one acre of land involved to C. A. Kelly, wherein it is recited as follows:
This deed was filed for record October 23, 1925. On the 21st day of October, 1925, R. L. Durham, trustee, conveyed by his special warranty deed all his right, title, and interest in and to the one acre of land to the Oxford Oil Company. Such deed was filed for record December 19, 1925. The Oxford Oil Company conveyed a one-fourth interest in the one acre to R. H. Ward.
On the 9th day of December, 1925, R. L. Durham executed and delivered to C. A. Kelly a correction deed to the one acre, wherein it is recited that he (Durham) held the title to the land in trust for Kelly, who paid the purchase money for same, and wherein it is recited as follows:
As both the Oxford Oil Company and Kelly were claiming the one acre under their respective deeds from Durham, and as both desired to have the land developed for the discovery of oil, they, on the 14th day of June, 1926, by agreement between them, made separate lease contracts with the Humphreys Corporation for such development; by the terms of such contracts Humphreys Corporation was to pay to Kelly and the Oxford Oil Company a one-sixteenth royalty of all oil and gas produced from the land. It was also agreed among said parties that the oil coming to Kelly and the Oxford Company should be deposited with the Guaranty Trust Company until their respective rights to the land should be determined by the courts or by compromise. Immediately after such agreement the Humphreys Corporation took possession of the land, produced large quantities of oil therefrom, which it sold to the Gulf Pipe Line Company.
On or about the 12th day of July, 1926, Kelly and the Oxford Company adjusted and settled their differences by an instrument in writing, whereby it was agreed that the Oxford Oil Company should convey to Kelly all of its right, title, and interest in the land...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gibson v. Turner
...referred to the 7/12 interest that actually passed under the granting clause (as in Hooks v. Neill, Tex.Civ.App., wr. of er. refused, 21 S.W.2d 532) or the tracts of land described in that clause (as in King v. First National Bank, 144 Tex. 583, 192 S.W.2d 260, 261, 163 A.L.R. The King case......
-
Averyt v. Grande, Inc.
...a fraction of the part of the mineral estate actually owned by the grantor and conveyed in the deed. Hooks v. Neill, 21 S.W.2d 532 (Tex.Civ.App.--Galveston 1929, writ ref'd). In Hooks, the grantor conveyed all of his undivided one-half interest in a tract of land. He then reserved "a one-th......
-
Moseley v. Fikes, 13848.
...only and not that of plaintiff. Bullock v. Smith, 72 Tex. 545, 10 S.W. 687; Kahn v. Kahn, 94 Tex. 114, 58 S.W. 825; Hooks v. Neill, Tex.Civ.App., 21 S.W.2d 532, 539, writ of error refused; Smith v. McElyea, 68 Tex. 70, 3 S.W. 258; Neyland v. Bendy, 69 Tex. 711, 7 S.W. 497; Murphy v. Johnson......
-
Condra v. Grogan Mfg. Co., 4625
...to defeat or disparage the title that he has conveyed. Simonds v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co., 134 Tex. 332, 114 S.W.2d 226; Hooks v. Neill, Tex.Civ.App., 21 S.W.2d 532; Barnard v. Blum, 69 Tex. 608, 7 S.W. From the views we have expressed above as to the effect of these conversations, it is se......
-
CHAPTER 4 BASIC MINERAL AND LEASEHOLD CONVEYANCING ISSUES
...Minerals, LLC, 502 S.W.3d 173, 180-84 (Tex. App. 2016) (citing Averyt v. Grande, Inc., 717 S.W.2d 891 (Tex. 1986)). [106] Hooks v. Neill, 21 S.W.2d 532, 538 (Tex. Civ. App. 1929).[107] Hysaw, 483 S.W.3d at 8.[108] Superior Oil Co. v. Vanderhoof, 297 F. Supp. 1086, 1089 (D. Mont. 1969); El P......