Hoppes v. Williams
Decision Date | 04 June 1919 |
Docket Number | (No. 7757.) |
Parties | HOPPES et al. v. WILLIAMS et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Harris County Court; Walter E. Monteith, Judge.
Suit by W. B. Williams and another against W. J. Hoppes and another. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. Reversed and rendered.
Fred R. Switzer, of Houston, for appellants.
W. B. Ware, of Houston, for appellees.
This suit was brought by appellees against appellants to recover the sum of $395, alleged to be due them upon an account claimed by the Bell Oil Company against appellants and which was by said company transferred to appellees. Upon trial by the court without a jury, judgment was rendered in favor of appellees for $214.10.
In their petition the plaintiffs, appellees here, alleged the existence of a certain contract between the Bell Oil Company and appellants, by the terms of which appellants agreed, for a valuable consideration, to pull the pipe from a certain well and to clean the same out. They alleged that after appellants began work under said contract and during said work the Bell Oil Company furnished them with money with which to buy fuel oil and $80 with which to purchase fishing tools, as it had contracted to do, and among other things advanced to appellants $395 on said contract to enable them to pay for labor, etc.; that thereafter appellants abandoned their contract without performance of any part thereof of value to said oil company, and that at time of such abandonment they were indebted to the oil company in the sum of $395, and that said oil company had transferred its claim against appellants to them.
Defendants answered, denying that they had breached the contract with the oil company, and averred that after they had, at a large expense, moved their machinery upon the ground for the purpose of pulling the pipe from said well and cleaning the same out as per their contract, the oil company failed and refused to furnish them with necessary tools with which to perform the work undertaken, as it had contracted to do, and thereby breached the contract to appellants' damage in a sum greater than the sum advanced to them by said oil company. They prayed that such sum be allowed as an offset to the claim of appellees.
There is no statement of facts on file in this court. Appellants rely, for a reversal of the judgment rendered by the trial court and the rendition of a judgment in their favor by this court, upon the findings of fact filed by the trial court, which are in substance as follows:
(1) That on the 24th day of May, 1916, the Bell Oil Company, a corporation, and the defendants, W. T. Hoppes and J. N. Coleman, doing business under the firm name of Hoppes & Coleman, made and entered into a written contract reading as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial- Ladies' Benev. Soc. of Beaumont v. Magnolia Cemetery Co.
-
Smith v. Patterson
...recovery, in the circumstances thus outlined, these authorities: Hahl v. Deutsch, 42 Tex. Civ. App. 1, 94 S. W. 443; Hoppes v. Williams (Tex. Civ. App.) 213 S. W. 328; Holiday Oil Co. v. Smith, 100 Okl. 172, 228 P. 775; McPherson v. San Joaquin County, 6 Cal. Unrep. 257, 56 P. 802; McConnel......