Horizon/Cms Healthcare Corp. v. Fischer
| Decision Date | 19 June 2003 |
| Docket Number | No. 02-0499.,02-0499. |
| Citation | 111 S.W.3d 67 |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
| Parties | HORIZON/CMS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, INC., d/b/a Doctors Healthcare Center, Petitioner, v. Harriet FISCHER, individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Harry Fischer, Respondent. |
Gregory J. Lensing, Christopher T. Colby, Andrea M. Kuntzman, Cowles & Thompson, P.C., Stan Thiebaud, Ty Alan Bailey, Stinnett Thiebaud & Remington, Dallas, for Petitioner.
Carolyn Mitchell, Law Office of Carolyn Mitchell, P.C., for respondent.
Harriet Fischer, individually and as executrix of the estate of Harry Fischer, sued Doctors Hospital and Doctors Healthcare Center (collectively, "Doctors"), asserting various claims arising from Doctors' alleged medical negligence in caring for Fischer's husband. Fischer timely filed an expert report authored by Mildred O. Hogstel, a registered nurse. The Hogstel report opined that the nursing care at Doctors Hospital was "below the standard of good nursing care" and that there were "serious concerns and questions about the signs of facial injury of Mr. Fischer at Doctors Healthcare Center" because such injuries were consistent with physical abuse.
Doctors moved to dismiss the case, claiming the Hogstel report did not comply with the Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act. See Tex.Rev.Civ. Stat. art. 4590i. Fischer filed a response verified by her counsel. Fischer argued that the report complied with the definition of "expert report" by giving a fair summary of Hogstel's opinions and by showing the claim was not frivolous. Alternatively, Fischer sought a thirty-day grace period pursuant to section 13.01(g) of the Act. She argued that, if the report was insufficient, it was the result of a mistake and not an intentional act or conscious indifference. According to Fischer's counsel, she believed the report was adequate when she filed it. She averred that the fact that she filed the report, along with the cost bonds, demonstrated that she did not act with conscious indifference.
The trial court, on Doctors' motion, dismissed Fischer's claims with prejudice. Fischer filed both a motion for rehearing and a motion for new trial. The trial court's docket sheet indicates that the motions were heard together on February 8, 1999 and were taken under advisement. While the docket sheet contains a February 9 entry indicating "Motion for New Trial granted and Motion for Rehearing is moot," the trial court did not issue a written order on the motion for new trial. Fischer appealed the dismissal.
The court of appeals reversed and remanded, holding that Hogstel was qualified as an expert but-relying on American Transitional Care Centers of Texas, Inc. v. Palacios, 46 S.W.3d 873 (Tex.2001)—that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Hogstel's report was not a good faith effort to comply with the statute. The court of appeals also held, however, that respondent's counsel's testimony that "she proferred the report under the `new Act' and that she believed the report complied with the Act's requirements" was uncontroverted and thus the trial court abused its...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hernandez v. Ebrom
...94 (Tex.2006) (per curiam) (dismissing with prejudice claims against physician due to inadequate report); Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp., Inc. v. Fischer, 111 S.W.3d 67, 68 (Tex. 2003) (same); Walker v. Gutierrez, 111 S.W.3d 56, 66 (Tex.2003) (same); Am. Transitional Care Ctrs. of Tex., Inc. ......
-
Sandles v. Howerton
...denied); Fischer v. Tenet Hosps., Ltd., 106 S.W.3d 110, 115 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2002), rev'd on other grounds by Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp. v. Fischer, 111 S.W.3d 67 (Tex.2003). Article 4590i section 13.01(r)(6) defined expert report . . . a written report by an expert that provides a fair s......
-
In re Bates
...Rule 329b requires a signed written order to grant a new trial. In re Lovito–Nelson, 278 S.W.3d at 775;Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp. v. Fischer, 111 S.W.3d 67, 68 (Tex.2003) (per curiam) (“We also decline respondent's request ... that we overrule our precedent (and ignore Texas Rule of Civil......
-
In re Brye, No. 14-07-00660CV (Tex. App. 10/11/2007)
...(thus ignoring Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 329b) requiring written orders granting new trials. See Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp., Inc. v. Fischer, 111 S.W.3d 67 (Tex. 2003). The cases relied upon by plaintiffs are inapposite to the case at bar. See Burns v. Bishop, 48 S.W.3d 459, 465 (Tex.......