Horn v. First Bank of Houston, 1240

Citation530 S.W.2d 864
Decision Date05 November 1975
Docket NumberNo. 1240,1240
PartiesH. D. HORN et al., Appellants, v. FIRST BANK OF HOUSTON, Texas, Appellee. (14th Dist.)
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Leo A. Kissner, Houston, for appellant.

Charles B. Wolfe, Lee, Brown & Wylie, Houston, for appellee.

TUNKS, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment for the plaintiff on a note and guaranty agreements. Appellee First Bank of Houston sought recovery on a promissory note from appellants H. D. Horn, F. H. Horn, Horn Investment Company, and Amco Investment Corporation and on guaranty agreements from appellants Mrs. H. D. Horn and Mrs. F. H. Horn. Appellee's motion for summary judgment was supported by the affidavit of Mr. Carl J. Walker, its vice-president and cashier. The affidavit recited that Mr. Walker was the custodian of appellee's books and records, including the note and guaranty agreements involved here; that the books and records were kept in the ordinary course of appellee's business; that it was the ordinary course of the business for an employee with actual knowledge of the transactions recorded to make such notations at or near the time the events occurred; and that the records indicated appellants were indebted to appellee in the amount of $157,988.76. Mr. Walker's affidavit recited further that Mrs. H. D. Horn and Mrs. F. H. Horn had, on December 1, 1972, executed continuing guaranty agreements guaranteeing payment of any present or future indebtedness to the appellee of Horn Investment Company or their respective husbands; that on February 8, 1974 appellants F. H. Horn, H. D. Horn, Horn Investment Company and Amco Investment Corporation executed a promissory note in the amount of $135,390.00; that the note is due and unpaid; and that appellee is the owner and holder of the note and guaranty agreements.

Appellants' answer to appellee's motion for summary judgment was supported by affidavits of F. H. Horn, Mrs. F. H. Horn and Mrs. H. D. Horn. The answer and affidavits alleged various defenses, including failure of consideration for the guaranty agreements and an offset due H. D. Horn, and also various defects in appellee's affidavit, including the affiant's failure to recite his personal knowledge of the facts stated. The trial court found there was no genuine issue of material fact raised by appellants' affidavits and granted summary judgment for appellee, from which appellants have perfected this appeal.

Under Rule 166--A of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure the party moving for summary judgment has the burden of proving by means of summary judgment proof independent of the pleadings that there...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Special Marine Products, Inc. v. Weeks Welding & Const., Inc.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • December 17, 1981
    ...1980); Garza v. Allied Finance Co., 566 S.W.2d 57 (Tex.Civ.App.-Corpus Christi 1978); and Horn v. First State Bank of Houston, 530 S.W.2d 864 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston (14th Dist.) 1975). On oral argument, appellants additionally cite Lancaster v. Wynnewood Bank, 470 S.W.2d 78 (Tex.Civ.App.-Wac......
  • Broaddus v. Town North Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • November 3, 1977
    ...by Rule 166-A(e)." In our opinion the Texas National case is not in point with the case at bar. Appellants also cite Horn v. First Bank of Houston, 530 S.W.2d 864 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston (14th Dist.) 1975, no writ); Lindley v. Smith, 524 S.W.2d 520 (Tex.Civ.App. Corpus Christi 1975, no writ);......
  • Dallas Eight, Ltd. v. Aaron Rents, Inc.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • December 29, 1977
    ...v. O'Hair, 417 S.W.2d 654 (Tex.Civ.App.-Amarillo 1967, n. w. h.); Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972); Horn v. First Bank of Houston, 530 S.W.2d 864 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston (14th Dist.) 1975, no writ). For the reasons stated above, we do not feel that appellee has proved a prima f......
  • Land Liquidators of Texas, Inc. v. Houston Post Co., A2926
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • January 7, 1982
    ...is competent to testify on the matters stated therein. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Penn, 363 S.W.2d 230 (Tex.1962); Horn v. First Bank of Houston, 530 S.W.2d 864 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston (14th Dist.) 1975, no writ); See Barham v. Sugar Creek National Bank, 612 S.W.2d 78 (Tex.Civ.App.-Housto......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT