Horton v. Baruch
Decision Date | 09 May 1950 |
Docket Number | 16354. |
Parties | HORTON v. BARUCH et al. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
McKay & McKay, Columbia, for appellant.
McLeod & Singletary, Columbia, for respondent.
This appeal comes from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Richland County affirming an award by the South Carolina Industrial Commission for death benefits under the South Carolina Workmen's Compensation Act, Code 1942 § 7035-1 et seq., to the widow and sole dependent of Herbert P. Horton.
The only question in this appeal is one of jurisdiction, and this will be solved by determining whether or not the deceased, Herbert P Horton, was a resident of South Carolina at the time of his death.
'The circuit court, and this court, on the appeal of either party to the proceeding, has both the power and the duty to consider all the evidence in the record, and find therefrom the jurisdictional facts, without regard to the finding of such facts by the Commission.' Watson v. Wannamaker & Wells, 212 S.C. 506, 48 S.E.2d 447, 448, citing Tedars v. Savannah River Veneer Co., 202 S.C. 363 25 S.E.2d 235, 147 A.L.R. 914; Knight v. Shepherd, 191 S.C. 452, 4 S.E.2d 906; McDowell v. Stilley Plywood Co., 210 S.C. 173, 41 S.E.2d 872.
There is evidence to the effect that Herbert P. Horton, a then recently discharged veteran of the Army Air Force with the rank of Colonel, came to Georgetown, South Carolina, in 1946 for the purpose of securing employment as pilot of the private plane of Miss Belle W. Baruch, which was to be based at her plantation near Georgetown, South Carolina. Colonel Horton returned to Georgetown again approximately March 1, 1946, for the purpose of inspecting the 'Gate Cottage' on this plantation, the occupancy of which was being considered as part of his compensation for the contemplated employment. As a result of these interviews he was employed for this position and was to receive, in addition to the occupancy of the 'Gate Cottage', the sum of $600.00 per month. This employment became effective March 1, 1946, and was confirmed by a telegram from Miss Baruch to Mr. Horton in Washington, D. C. He was then instructed by Miss Baruch to proceed to New York where he was about her business for several weeks when he was then directed by her to proceed to Wichita, Kansas, for the purpose of accepting delivery of an airplane which she had previously purchased from the Beech Aircraft Corporation. After arriving in Wichita and making several preliminary flights, he was instructed to fly the plane to Wilmington, Delaware, where certain radio equipment was to be installed. On April 7, 1946, while in the act of carrying out these instructions, the plane crashed on the take off and Mr. Horton died immediately. Miss Baruch, as the employer, filed the required report of accident form with the South Carolina Industrial Commission and this is included as an exhibit in the case and states that Colonel Horton's residence was the same as her own, namely, Belleview Plantation, Georgetown, South Carolina.
The following testimony of the employer, Miss Belle Baruch, is of some significance:
'Mr. McKay: We object to this line of questioning on the grounds of irrelevancy unless Mr. McLeod ties it in with later testimony.
'Mr. McKay: We object to that question.
Mr. Frank H. Horton, brother of the deceased, testified that in 1945, the deceased and Mrs. Horton were living in Del Ray, Florida, where he was stationed at that time in military service, and that, at the time of his death, Mrs. Horton was temporarily living with her father in the state of Massachusetts.
Section 7035-39, South Carolina Code 1942, provides: 'Where an accident happens while the employee is employed elsewhere than in this State which would entitle him or his dependents to compensation if it had happened in this State, the employee or his dependents shall be entitled to compensation, if the contract of employment was made in this State, if the employer's place of business is in this State, and if the residence of the employee is in this State; provided his contract of employment was not expressly for service exclusively outside of the State * * *.'
Construing the foregoing section, it will be seen that there are four prerequisites to the South Carolina Industrial Commission's having jurisdiction: 1. The contract of employment must be made in this State; 2. The employer's place of business must be in this State; 3. The residence of the employee must be in this State; 4. The contract of employment must be for services to be performed not exclusively outside of this State. Price v. Horton Motor Lines, 201 S.C. 484, 23 S.E.2d 744. It is conceded that three of the requirements have been complied with and that we are concerned in this appeal only with the question of residence.
Webster's Dictionary, Fifth Edition, defines 'residence' as '* * * Act or fact of living in some place in the discharge of a duty or as a qualification, as to be in residence; the place where one actually has his...
To continue reading
Request your trial