Horton v. Rodriguez Espaillat Y Asociados

Decision Date05 April 2006
Docket NumberNo. 3D05-1884.,3D05-1884.
Citation926 So.2d 436
PartiesHelen B. HORTON, Appellant, v. RODRIGUEZ ESPAILLAT Y ASOCIADOS, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Weissman, Dervishi, Borgo & Nordlund, P.A., Brian S. Dervishi, and John Borgo, Miami, and Jonathan Bakalarz, for appellant.

Silva & Silva, P.A., Miami, and Ibrahim Reyes, Jr., for appellee.

Before GREEN, RAMIREZ, and SUAREZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying defendant's motion to vacate the final judgment pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b). Where a party asserts that the underlying judgment is void, "it is necessary to evaluate the underlying judgment in reviewing the order denying the motion. If it is determined that the judgment entered is void, the trial court has no discretion, but is obligated to vacate the judgment." Dep't of Transp. v. Bailey, 603 So.2d 1384, 1386-87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

In this case, the underlying judgment is void because the complaint, on its face, fails to state a recognizable claim against the defendant, see Becerra v. Equity Imports, Inc., 551 So.2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Magnificent Twelve, Inc. v. Walker, 522 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); see also Palmer v. Parker, 52 Fla. 389, 42 So. 398, 400 (1906), for liability on the dishonored checks. The trial court should have granted the motion on this basis.

This cause is therefore reversed and remanded for further proceedings. The remaining points raised on appeal lack merit.

Reversed and remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Wiggins v. Tigrent, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 30, 2014
    ...court's discretion; if a judgment previously entered is void, the trial court must vacate the judgment. Horton v. Rodriguez Espaillat y Asociados, 926 So.2d 436, 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (quoting Dep't of Transp. v. Bailey, 603 So.2d 1384, 1386–87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) ).Tigrent bases its argum......
  • Lamoise Grp., LLC v. Edgewater S. Beach Condo. Ass'n, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 14, 2019
    ...must vacate the judgment." Wiggins v. Tigrent, Inc., 147 So. 3d 76, 81 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ; see also Horton v. Rodriguez Espaillat y Asociados, 926 So. 2d 436, 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ("If it is determined that the judgment entered is void, the trial court has no discretion, but is obligated......
  • Regions Bank v. Big Bend Invs. Grp. of Fla., LLC
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 24, 2020
    ...court must vacate the judgment." Wiggins v. Tigrent, Inc., 147 So. 3d 76, 81 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (citing Horton v. Rodriguez Espaillat y Asociados, 926 So. 2d 436, 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ). Determining whether a judgment is void poses a question of law that we review de novo. See Dabas v. Bo......
  • Phenion Development Group, Inc. v. Love
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 29, 2006
    ...rate, the trial court lacked "subject matter jurisdiction" to award interest at the default contract rate, citing Horton v. Rodriguez, 926 So.2d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) and Decubellis v. Ritchotte, 730 So.2d 723 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Neither of these cases support Appellants' In Decubellis, t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT