Hoskins v. Ramsey
Decision Date | 30 January 1923 |
Citation | 247 S.W. 371,197 Ky. 465 |
Parties | HOSKINS ET AL. v. RAMSEY ET AL. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Action by H. M. Hoskins and others against Wm. Ramsey and others. On motion of plaintiffs to dissolve the injunction granted against them and to reinstate the temporary injunction, and on motion of defendants for permanent injunction against plaintiffs. Motion of plaintiffs overruled, and injunction granted on motion of defendants.
Roscoe Vanover and W. W. Reynolds, both of Pikeville, for plaintiffs.
Stratton & Stephenson, of Pikeville (Martin Kelly, of Frankfort amicus curiæ), for defendants.
The three plaintiffs, Hoskins and others, were elected in November, 1920, and took office January 1, 1921, for a term of two years each, having drawn the short terms. By the provisions of the statutes above quoted their successors were required to be elected in November, 1922, as the terms of office of Hoskins and others expired on December 31, 1922. At that election it appears that Hoskins and others, as well as defendants, Ramsey, etc., were all candidates, but the latter, receiving the greater number of votes, were declared elected members of said board in place of the plaintiffs Hoskins and others; but Hoskins and others declined to surrender their offices and to turn over to defendants, Ramsey, etc., the books and records belonging to the said office, although defendants, Ramsey, etc., had, under their certificate of election duly qualified as members of the board and were attempting to get possession of the office and to exercise the duties thereof.
It is the contention of plaintiffs, Hoskins and others, that members of the board of education of fourth-class cities or other municipalities could not, under section 148 of our Constitution, be elected in November, 1922, because at said regular election a member of Congress was chosen and the attempted election of the defendants, Ramsey, etc., was void and of no effect, and their attempted qualification a nullity. That part of the constitutional provision upon which plaintiffs rely for the disqualification of defendants reads:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Glass v. City of Hopkinsville
...in such offices may be filled." Section 160. Members of the board of education are state officers (Hoskins v. Ramsey, 197 Ky. 465, 247 S.W. 371; Whitt v. Wilson, 212 Ky. 281, 278 609), but, as the district which they serve is not larger than a county, the case is governed by the provisions ......
-
Ridings v. Jones
... ... Ky. Law Rep. 993; Clark v. Board of Trustees, 175 ... S.W. 359, 164 Ky. 213; Smith v. Board of Trustees, ... 186 S.W. 927, 171 Ky. 39; Hoskins v. Ramsey, 247 ... S.W. 371, 197 Ky. 468 ... Under ... the Act of March 24, 1908, p. 133 (Kentucky Statutes 1915, ... 4426a), ... ...
-
Middleton v. Middleton
... ... recognized and named by section 155 of the Constitution. It ... is recognized by section 3746, Ky. Statutes. In Hoskins ... v. Ramsey, 197 Ky. 465, 247 S.W. 371, the Court of ... Appeals declared that members of the county board of ... education are state and not ... ...
-
Com. v. Burnett
...of its public schools, the instrumentalities in charge of them, and the taxes collected for their maintenance. Following Hoskins v. Ramsey, 197 Ky. 465, 247 S.W. 371, it there again declared that members of the county board of education are state and not county or municipal officers. Likewi......