Hospital Authority of Fulton County v. McDaniel
| Decision Date | 06 July 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. A89A0551,A89A0551 |
| Citation | 385 S.E.2d 8,192 Ga.App. 398 |
| Parties | HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF FULTON COUNTY v. McDANIEL. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Long, Weinberg, Ansley & Wheeler, Robert G. Tanner, Ronald R. Coleman, Jr., Atlanta, for appellant.
Shuford & Associates, E. Graydon Shuford, Decatur, Allen & Ballard, Hunter S. Allen, Jr., Atlanta, for appellee.
This medical malpractice case was filed originally in March 1985. In June 1988, the original action was dismissed without prejudice for failure of counsel for plaintiffs, the McDaniels, to appear at a peremptory calendar call. Within the six-month period allowed by OCGA § 9-2-61, the McDaniels refiled the action. The renewed complaint specifically incorporated the discovery taken in the previously dismissed action, including the deposition of the McDaniels' expert, David H. Sherman, M.D. However, the McDaniels failed to attach the required affidavit pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-9.1 to the renewed complaint. Defendant/Appellant Northside moved to dismiss the renewed complaint for failure to file the required affidavit. The McDaniels then amended their complaint to include the affidavit of Dr. Sherman. The trial court denied Northside's motion and this interlocutory appeal followed. Held:
We find that this case is controlled by the holding in St. Joseph's Hosp. v. Nease, 259 Ga. 153, 377 S.E.2d 847 (1989). In Nease, the Supreme Court held that failure to file the affidavit required in a medical malpractice case is an amendable defect curable under Rule 15(a) of the Civil Practice Act in a case in which the action is renewed and the plaintiff fails to attach an affidavit that had been obtained in the previous suit. Nease at 155, 377 S.E.2d 847.
The situation in the present case is similar. As in Nease, the plaintiffs in this case withstood a motion for summary judgment in the previously filed action. The testimony of the expert in the original action in Nease was in the form of an affidavit; in the present case, the expert's testimony was in the form of a deposition. By incorporating the discovery from the original action in the complaint for the renewed action, the McDaniels complied with the spirit, if...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Glisson v. Hospital Authority of Valdosta & Lowndes County
...Hosp. Auth., 204 Ga.App. 256, 419 S.E.2d 36 (1992); Reid v. Brazil, 193 Ga.App. 1, 387 S.E.2d 1 (1989); Hosp. Auth. of Fulton County v. McDaniel, 192 Ga.App. 398, 385 S.E.2d 8 (1989). Moreover, permitting amendment to a complaint filed under OCGA § 9-11-9.1 is consistent with the intent of ......
-
Brown v. Middle Georgia Hosp., Inc.
...distinguishes this case from Nease, supra; Bell v. Figueredo, 259 Ga. 321, 381 S.E.2d 29 (1989); and Hosp. Auth. of Fulton County v. McDaniel, 192 Ga.App. 398, 385 S.E.2d 8 (1989). In the instant case, Brown's choice to file the affidavit of another expert was intentional and deliberate. Th......
-
Vitner v. Miller
...basis for actions against professionals. Clearly, such a basis existed in the present case...." Hosp. Auth. of Fulton County v. McDaniel, 192 Ga.App. 398, 385 S.E.2d 8 (1989). Accordingly, we hold that the trial court did not err in denying Vitner's motion to dismiss the complaint on this J......
-
Raskin v. Wallace, A94A1870
...of the renewed action because this "complied with the spirit, if not the letter, of OCGA § 9-11-9.1." Hosp. Auth. of Fulton County v. McDaniel, 192 Ga.App. 398, 385 S.E.2d 8 (1989). Here, Raskin has clearly attempted such compliance. Moreover, given Dr. Morgan's testimony that Raskin's doct......
-
Trial Practice and Procedure - C. Frederick Overby and Jason Crawford
...416 S.E.2d at 285 (citations omitted). 8. Raskin, 215 Ga. App. at 603-04, 451 S.E.2d at 425. 9. Id. at 604-05, 451 S.E.2d at 486. 10. 192 Ga. App. 398, 385 S.E.2d 8 (1989). 11. O.C.G.A. Sec. 9-11-9.1(a) requires a plaintiff to file an affidavit contemporaneously with the complaint in a malp......
-
Legal Ethics - Roy M. Sobelson
...the former affidavit was not the basis for Brown's argument distinguishes this case from . . . Hosp. Auth. of Fulton County v. McDaniel, 192 Ga. App. 398, 385 S.E.2d 8 (1989).130 Apparently, the court in Brown would have dismissed the complaint in McDaniel had it not specifically made refer......