Hotel Employees Local No 255, Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union v. Leedom

Decision Date24 November 1958
Docket NumberNo. 21,21
Citation3 L.Ed.2d 143,358 U.S. 99,79 S.Ct. 150
PartiesHOTEL EMPLOYEES LOCAL NO. 255, HOTEL AND RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES AND BARTENDERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, et al., Petitioners, v. Boyd LEEDOM, Individually and as Chairman, National Labor Relations Board, et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Mr. J. W. Brown, for petitioners.

Mr. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C., for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We believe that dismissal of the representation petition on the sole ground of the Board's 'long standing policy not to exercise jurisdiction over the hotel industry' as a class, is contrary to the principles expressed in Office Employes International Union, Local No. 11, AFLCIO v. National Labor Relations Board, 1957, 353 U.S. 313, 318—320, 77 S.Ct. 799, 802 803, 1 L.Ed.2d 846. The judgment is therefore reversed and the case remanded to the Court of Appeals for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Judgment reversed and case remanded with directions.

To continue reading

Request your trial
35 cases
  • Chaney v. Heckler, 82-2321
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 17 Enero 1984
    ...statutory mandates. See, e.g., Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184, 79 S.Ct. 180, 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1958); Hotel Employees Local No. 255 v. Leedom, 358 U.S. 99, 79 S.Ct. 150, 3 L.Ed.2d 143 (1958); Office Employees Int'l Union, Local No. 11 v. NLRB, 353 U.S. 313, 77 S.Ct. 799, 1 L.Ed.2d 846 (1957).By ......
  • Physicians Nat. House Staff Ass'n v. Fanning
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 23 Febrero 1981
    ...on commerce is not sufficiently substantial to warrant the exercise of its jurisdiction(.)See Hotel Employees Local No. 255 v. Leedom, 358 U.S. 99, 79 S.Ct. 150, 3 L.Ed.2d 143 (1958); Office Employes Internat'l Union, Local No. 11 v. NLRB, 353 U.S. 313, 77 S.Ct. 799, 1 L.Ed.2d 846 (1957).51......
  • National Maritime Union of America v. NLRB
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 30 Marzo 1967
    ...Employes International Union v. NLRB, 353 U.S. 313, 77 S.Ct. 799, 1 L.Ed.2d 846 (1957) and Hotel Employees Local No. 255, etc. v. Leedom, 358 U.S. 99, 79 S.Ct. 150, 3 L.Ed. 2d 143 (1958) are not to the contrary. In both of these cases, the Board had refused to exercise its jurisdiction on a......
  • Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 14 Diciembre 1964
    ...306 U.S. 601, 608—609, 59 S.Ct. 668, 672—673, 83 L.Ed. 1014; cf. Hotel Employees Local No. 255, Hotel and Restaurant Emp. and Bartenders International Union v. Leedom, 358 U.S. 99, 79 S.Ct. 150, 3 L.Ed.2d 143. There are approximately 20,000,000 Negroes in our country.9 Many of them are able......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT