House v. State, 2D02-835.

Decision Date11 December 2002
Docket NumberNo. 2D02-835.,2D02-835.
PartiesLovy HOUSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Edward Lee Giles, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

WHATLEY, Judge.

Lovy House appeals his convictions and sentences of several offenses arising out of his driving a stolen car that was involved in a fatal collision. We reverse House's conviction of third-degree murder.

The record shows that on August 26, 2001, Emma Sanders rented a Dodge Intrepid and parked it at her hotel near Tampa International Airport at approximately 9:00 p.m. She discovered that the car was missing the following day around 7:30 a.m. At about 1:00 p.m., the Intrepid grazed and damaged Frederick Brown's car as he was sitting at the intersection of Central Avenue and Martin Luther King Boulevard waiting for the light to change. The driver of the Intrepid was Lovy House. He did not stop but drove through the intersection on a red light. Brown called 911 on his cell phone and followed the Intrepid on Central Avenue when the signal changed in an attempt to obtain the tag number. House drove at not too fast a rate of speed at first, but he then "really accelerated" and took off. Brown stated that the Intrepid was going "a whole lot faster" than the forty miles an hour that he was driving. Brown was never able to catch up to the Intrepid to obtain the tag number. The Intrepid then crashed into another car farther up the road, but Brown did not witness the collision. The collision killed Kevin Rogers.

Valecia Sampson lived just south of the intersection at which the collision occurred. She described the area as a residential neighborhood. She saw the Intrepid traveling at "a very high rate of speed" that was unusual for the neighborhood, and she saw it swerve in an attempt to avoid hitting Rogers' car at the intersection. House had the right of way at the intersection. Sampson could not see Rogers' car because of a large tree blocking her view. She said that trees blocked drivers' views from both directions at the intersection and that drivers coming from Rogers' direction had to pull past the stop sign to see oncoming traffic. Sampson has witnessed quite a few accidents at that intersection, most of which were fender benders.

The evidence revealed that the Intrepid was stolen by someone prying the door lock, popping the ignition, and using a blunt object to start the car.

Detective David Puig, who is assigned to the hit and run traffic homicide squad, testified as an expert in accident reconstruction and speed calculation.1 He stated that the speed limit along Central Avenue at the site of the collision was thirty miles per hour. The Intrepid was traveling at approximately sixty miles per hour before the collision. There were skid marks for approximately forty-seven feet before the point of impact, which was more or less in the middle of the intersection. Puig estimated that due to his braking, House was driving at a minimum of fifty miles per hour at the time of impact. The victim's vehicle was traveling at approximately ten to fifteen miles per hour. The day was hot, dry, and clear. The collision occurred about a half a mile and less than a minute from the intersection where House side-swiped Brown's vehicle.

Based on these facts, the State charged House with third-degree murder of Rogers, vehicular homicide of Rogers, grand theft of a motor vehicle, burglary of a conveyance, operating a vehicle without a valid driver's license and causing death or serious bodily injury, and leaving the scene of a crash. A jury found House guilty as charged.2

We agree with House that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal of the charge of third-degree murder. Consistent with the thirddegree murder statute, § 782.04(4), Fla. Stat. (2001), the State charged that House unlawfully killed Rogers without any design or intent while engaged in the perpetration of, or the attempt to perpetrate, the grand theft of a motor vehicle.

"In any felony murder conviction the element of causation, i.e. [sic] that the homicide was committed in the perpetration of the felony, must be established." Allen v. State, 690 So.2d 1332, 1334 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Stated another way, the State must prove that there was no break in the chain of circumstances beginning with the felony and ending with the murder. Parker v. State, 641 So.2d 369 (Fla. 1994). Here, the State presented no evidence of when House came into possession of the Intrepid, which was discovered missing nearly six hours before the fatal collision. Consequently, "[t]he State did not prove that the grand theft and the homicide bore a sufficient connection `in point of time, place, or causal relationship' to support" House's conviction of third-degree murder. Lester v. State, 737 So.2d 1149, 1152 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (quoting Allen, 690...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • State v. Gensler
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 5, 2006
    ...dead of night, are struck and killed by vehicles which are not even carelessly, let alone recklessly, operated. See House v. State, 831 So.2d 1230, 1233 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)("Speed alone will not support a charge of vehicular homicide. The only evidence of the manner in which House was drivin......
  • Santiago v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 26, 2004
    ...by requiring that there be a causal connection between the felony that was committed and the killing of the victim. House v. State, 831 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Allen v. State, 690 So.2d 1332, 1334 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). As the court explained in Allen, "In any felony murder conviction t......
  • Santisteban v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 31, 2011
    ...in Florida have stated that “speed alone” is insufficient to support a conviction for vehicular homicide.3 See, e.g., House v. State, 831 So.2d 1230, 1233 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (holding that evidence was insufficient to support conviction for vehicular homicide where the defendant was driving ......
  • Santisteban v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 14, 2011
    ...in Florida have stated that "speed alone" is insufficient to support a conviction for vehicular homicide.3 See, e.g., House v. State, 831 So. 2d 1230, 1233 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (holding that evidence was insufficient to support conviction for vehicular homicide where the defendant was driving......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT