Houston Chronicle Pub. Co. v. City of Houston

Decision Date28 April 1976
Docket NumberNo. B--5773,B--5773
Citation536 S.W.2d 559
CourtTexas Supreme Court
PartiesHOUSTON CHRONICLE PUBLISHING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. CITY OF HOUSTON et al., Respondents.

Liddell, Sapp, Zivley & Brown, W. Robert Brown, Robert J. King and Charles H. Waters, Jr., Houston, for petitioner.

Jonathan S. Day, City Atty., Houston, John L. Hill, Atty. Gen., David Kendall, Jr., First Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, for respondents.

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The Houston Chronicle filed this action seeking an interpretation of the Texas Open Records Act, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 6252--17a (supp.1975). The trial court held that sections 3(a)(1), 3(a)(8), 6(1), 6(15), and 14(a) of the Act were unconstitutional and held that the Act does not provide a lawful basis for the withholding of police records. The court of civil appeals reversed the trial court's holdings that the stated provisions were unconstitutional, but also ordered the disclosure of certain kinds of records. 531 S.W.2d 177. The Houston Chronicle has filed an application for writ of error, insisting that all of the police records must be disclosed. The City of Houston and the other defendants have not complained of the judgment of the court of civil appeals.

There are three different kinds of police records in controversy: Offense Reports, Personal History and Individual Arrest Records, and administrative records. Offense Reports compile information concerning a specific crime. The information sometimes includes the names and description of any suspects, names of persons arrested for this particular crime, name and description of the complainant, place of the crime, names of witnesses, a detailed description of the offense, the police officer's evaluation of the witnesses or suspect, synopsis of confessions and police laboratory reports. Personal History and Individual Arrest Records contain information on particular persons suspected of crimes. They contain the suspect's name and personal data including a mug shot, marital status and names of relatives. The primary purpose of the Personal History and Individual Arrest Record is to list chronologically all of the offenses for which the person has ever been arrested; however, the final disposition of the charge is not always noted. The third kind of record, broadly categorized as administrative records, consists of three kinds of documents, Arrest Sheets, Show-Up Sheets, and the Blotter. In general, these three records include such information as the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
45 cases
  • Villarreal v. City of Laredo
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • August 12, 2022
    ...Complaint ¶ 35 at ROA.159.14 See generally Tex. Gov't Code ch. 52; id. §§ 552.001, 552.101, 552.108.15 See Houston Chronicle Publ'g Co. v. City of Houston , 536 S.W.2d 559 (Tex. 1976), aff'g Houston Chronicle Publ'g Co. v. City of Houston , 531 S.W.2d 177 (Tex. Civ. App.—Houston [14th] 1975......
  • United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee For Freedom of the Press
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 22, 1989
    ...arrest data such as rap sheets. See Houston Chronicle Publishing Co. v. City of Houston, 531 S.W.2d 177 (Tex.Civ.App.1975), aff'd, 536 S.W.2d 559 (Tex.1976); Stephens v. Van Arsdale, 227 Kan. 676, 608 P.2d 972 (1980). 3 "The section was plagued with vague phrases, such as that exempting fro......
  • Davenport v. Garcia
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • June 17, 1992
    ...Tucker ); Ex parte Pruitt, 551 S.W.2d 706, 710 (Tex.1977) (provision neither applied nor discussed); Houston Chronicle Publ. Co. v. City of Houston, 536 S.W.2d 559, 561 (Tex.1976) (provision held not violated without discussion); City of Fort Worth v. Craik, 411 S.W.2d 541, 542-543 (Tex.196......
  • In Re: Jane Doe 2
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • March 7, 2000
    ...Houston Chronicle Pub. Co. v. City of Houston, 531 S.W.2d 177, 183 (Tex. Civ. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1975), writ ref'd n.r.e., 536 S.W.2d 559 (Tex. 1976); cf. Dreyer v. Greene, 871 S.W.2d 697, 698 (Tex.1993)("a claim, including a constitutional claim, must have been asserted in the tria......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT