Hover Motors, In re
Decision Date | 13 March 1950 |
Docket Number | No. 16265,16265 |
Citation | 121 Colo. 439,217 P.2d 863 |
Parties | In re HOVER MOTORS, Inc. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER et al. v. HOVER MOTORS, Inc. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
J. Glenn Donaldson, Denver, Charles, H. Haines, Denver, for plaintiffs in error.
Harry A. King, Denver, Emory L. O'Connell, Denver, for defendant in error.
Defendant in error, a licensed automobile dealer, is engaged principally in the business of buying, exchanging, selling, and trading in motor vehicles, trailers and semitrailers. Its stock of merchandise was assessed for the year 1948 upon the average amount of money invested in merchandise during each calendar momth of the taxable year in accordance with the following statute:
Sections 6 and 7, chapter 158, S.L. '43, under which the above assessment was made, provide:
* * *'
Section 4, Article X, of the Constitution, exempts from taxation, 'The property, real and personal, of the state, counties, cities, towns and other municipal corporations and public libraries * * *.' Section 5 of said article exempts real and personal property 'that is used solely and exclusively for religious worship, for schools or for strictly charitable purposes, also cemeteries not used or held for private or corporate profit.' Section of said article, as amended November 3, 1936, S.L. '37, p. 326, provides:
'Said graduated annual specific ownership tax shall be in lieu of all ad valorem taxes upon such property, and shall be distributed, apportioned, credited and paid over to the State and its political subdivisions as provided by law with reference to ad valorem taxes; Provided further, that such laws shall not exempt from ad valorem taxation motor vehicles, trailers and semitrailers in process of manufacture, or held in storage, or which constitute the stock of manufacturers, or distributors thereof or of dealers therein.' (Emphasis supplied.)
Chapter 127, S.L. '47, in so far as pertinent, provides:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cass v. Colorado Beverage Co.
...55, chapter 142, '35 C.S.A., as amended by chapter 158, S.L. '43, and quoted, in so far as here material, in City and County of Denver v. Hover Motors, Colo., 217 P.2d 863, require that all stocks of merchandise shall be assessed as of March 1 of each year on the average amount of money and......
-
Cooper Motors v. Board of County Com'rs of Jackson County, 17449
...solely by virtue of the rule of law as laid down by the Supreme Court of Colorado in the case of [City and County of] Denver v. Hover Motors, 121 Colo. 439, 217 P.2d 863, plaintiff is not entitled to the relief sought by it in this action and the cars in plaintiff's stock of merchandise upo......