Howald v. City of Olivette, No. ED

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation998 S.W.2d 877
Decision Date31 August 1999
Docket NumberNo. ED
PartiesKenneth HOWALD, Respondent, v. CITY OF OLIVETTE (Olivette Fire Dept.), Appellant. 75393.

Page 877

998 S.W.2d 877
Kenneth HOWALD, Respondent,
v.
CITY OF OLIVETTE (Olivette Fire Dept.), Appellant.
No. ED 75393.
Missouri Court of Appeals,
Eastern District,
Division Four.
Aug. 31, 1999.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission of Missouri.

Page 878

Martin Klug, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for appellant.

Robert J. Lenze, Robert J. Lenze, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.

Before HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, City of Olivette, ("employer") appeals the judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission in favor of respondent, Kenneth Howald, awarding him compensation. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the award is supported by substantial and competent evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence based on the record as a whole. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT