Howard v. State, AL-456

Decision Date11 August 1982
Docket NumberNo. AL-456,AL-456
Citation417 So.2d 1152
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
PartiesJames HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James Howard, pro se, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Howard appeals the lower court's summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, Howard alleges first, that his sentence was imposed in violation of a plea agreement which had previously been accepted by the trial court, thus rendering his guilty plea involuntary; and second, that the assistant public defender, who was standing-in at sentencing for Howard's absent counsel, rendered ineffective assistance in failing to object to the allegedly improper sentence. We find these allegations legally sufficient. See, Rice v. State, 400 So.2d 461 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981).

Accordingly, the lower court was required to attach those portions of the files and records which conclusively show that Howard is entitled to no relief, or to hold an evidentiary hearing on the motion. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. The court having failed to do so, this case is REVERSED and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the rule and this opinion.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C. J., and LARRY G. SMITH and WENTWORTH, JJ ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Chapman v. State, 83-407
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 1 December 1983
    ...Torna v. Wainwright, 649 F.2d 290 (5th Cir.1981); Hopkins v. State, 413 So.2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see also Howard v. State, 417 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Finally, this deficiency clearly resulted in prejudice to Chapman, since he was convicted of the higher offense which would hav......
  • Adams v. State, BA-313
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 17 December 1984
    ...of sentence in violation of an accepted plea agreement is a legally sufficient basis for relief by a 3.850 motion. Howard v. State, 417 So.2d 1152, 1153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). When legally sufficient grounds are stated in the motion, the court must either attach "copies of that portion of the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT