Howard v. State, 53733
Decision Date | 04 August 1982 |
Docket Number | No. 53733,53733 |
Citation | 417 So.2d 932 |
Parties | John L. HOWARD v. STATE of Mississippi. |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Buren T. Batson, Jr., Lexington, for appellant.
Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Charles W. Maris, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.
Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BOWLING and DAN M. LEE, JJ.
In the Circuit Court of Holmes County, John L. Howard was convicted of statutory rape under the provisions of Miss.Code Ann. Sec. 97-3-67 (Supp.1980), and sentenced to five years in the penitentiary.
The evidence presented consisted of testimony of Patricia Ann Garrette, prosecutrix, that some time in October, 1980, Howard, her uncle, came to her family's house when she was alone, pushed her onto a bed, removed her clothes, and had sexual intercourse with her. Prosecutrix testified that when her family returned home she did not reveal what had transpired out of fear. A month later, prosecutrix told Howard her belief that she was pregnant whereupon, according to her, Howard said, "You better not tell anybody, you know, because that will make you look stupid, your uncle doing that to you", and "Well, if you think you are pregnant, you should go out and get you a boy or something, you know."
Further testimony consisted of statements by prosecutrix and her mother that Howard told his mother, prosecutrix' grandmother, of the pregnancy at a time when she had told no one other than Howard. Prosecutrix' mother testified that her son told her he overheard Howard tell prosecutrix to go out with other boys. Lastly, prosecutrix testified a child was born to her on June 13, 1981.
In order to affirm the conviction for statutory rape, Miss.Code Ann. Sec. 97-3-69 (1972), requires that the testimony of the prosecutrix must be corroborated by other evidence.
The degree of corroboration is set forth in Yancy v. State, 202 Miss. 662, 668, 32 So.2d 151, 152 (1947), as follows, "corroboration must be, not merely of incidental details, but of the commission of the prohibited act."
Gillis v. State, 152 Miss. 551, 120 So. 455 (1929), involved a conviction of statutory rape upon facts similar to this case. In Gillis, the prosecutrix, when in travail, told her father that appellant was the father of her child, her father testified that appellant was the only boy she had ever been alone with, and a child was born to the prosecutrix. In holding that the evidence failed to corroborate the prosecutrix on the main...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Murriel v. State, 57684
...with irrelevant evidence of an abortion. Though pregnancy and possibly abortion may be relevant to show penetration, Howard v. State, 417 So.2d 932, 933 (Miss.1982); see generally, Annot. 62 A.L.R.2d 1083 (1958 & Supp.1987), it may not be relevant to show consent or identity. See Howard, 41......
-
Parker v. State, 2003-KA-02593-COA.
...facts to this one, a girl alleged that she was raped by her uncle and later became pregnant as a result of the assault. Howard v. State, 417 So.2d 932, 933 (Miss.1982). At trial, the victim testified as to the nature of the specifics of the assault and offered the fact of her pregnancy as c......