Howell v. Roberts

CourtSupreme Court of Nebraska
Writing for the CourtMAXWELL
Citation29 Neb. 483,45 N.W. 923
PartiesHOWELL ET AL. v. ROBERTS ET AL.
Decision Date06 May 1890

29 Neb. 483
45 N.W. 923

HOWELL ET AL.
v.
ROBERTS ET AL.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

May 6, 1890.



Syllabus by the Court.

Section 136, c. 16, Comp. St., which makes stockholders in a corporation liable for debts contracted by the corporation while its officers are in default in publishing an annual notice stating “the amount of all the existing debts of the corporation,” is quasi penal, but is not a penalty; the evident purpose being to secure the rights of creditors, and an action to recover such debts is not barred by the statute of limitations in one year.


Error to district court, Harlan county; GASLIN, Judge.

[45 N.W. 923]

Morning & Keester, for plaintiffs in error.

C. C. Flansburg, for defendants in error.


MAXWELL, J.

This action is brought upon four drafts, each for $1,200, which were drawn upon and accepted by the Nebraska Lumber Company of Red Cloud. The drafts are dated December 5, 1885, and were payable, respectively, February 10, 1886, February 25, 1886, March 15, 1886, and March 25, 1886. The drafts not being paid, an action was brought on the 28th of December, 1887, against the defendants, who were the stockholders in the corporation. A demurrer to the petition was sustained in the court below, and the action dismissed. The plaintiff in the petition, after stating the incorporation of the lumber company, and that the defendants were the stockholders thereof, the acceptance of the drafts, etc., alleges: “That said Nebraska Lumber Co., its officers, agents, directors, stockholders, managers, or servants, did not at any time post, in a conspicuous place, at the places of doing business of said corporation, subject to public inspection, a copy of the by-laws of said corporation, and the names of all officers appended thereto; and said Nebraska Lumber Company neglected to give notice annually in some newspaper printed in the county or counties, in which its business was transacted, (there being newspapers printed in the said counties,) of the amount of all existing debts of the corporation, signed by the president and a majority of

[45 N.W. 924]

the directors, as required by the statutes of the state of Nebraska; that all of said defendants were stockholders in said Nebraska Lumber Company, and were such stockholders at the time of such default in failure to give the notice first above mentioned, and were such stockholders at the time of the failure to post a notice stating the names of officers and the place of doing business, and were...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 practice notes
  • Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Crowell
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • 17 Octubre 1917
    ...Huntington v. Attrill, 146 U.S. 657, 13 Sup.Ct. 224, 36 L.Ed. 1123; Flowers v. Bartlett, 66 Minn. 213, 68 N.W. 976; Howell v. Roberts, 29 Neb. 483, 45 N.W. 923; Coy v. Jones, 30 Neb. 798, 47 N.W. 208, 10 L.R.A. 658; Fitzgerald v. Weidenbeck et al. (C.C.) 78 F. 695. There is no penalty in th......
  • Globe Publishing Company v. State Bank of Nebraska at Crete, 5538
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Nebraska
    • 6 Junio 1894
    ...not provide for the recovery of a penalty. (Anderson's Dictionary of Law; Sutherland, Statutory Construction, sec. 208; Howell v. Roberts, 29 Neb. 483; Coy v. Jones, 30 Neb. 798.) Section 136 is a part of the charter of the Globe Publishing Company. (Abbott v. Omaha Smelting Co., 4 Neb. 416......
  • Mayar v. Poe
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • 2 Julio 1906
    ...cited; 10 Cyc. 854-5-6. The liability therefore must be contractual. 3 Thomp. Corp., § 4164; 76 F. 695; 61 Minn. 375; 11 Neb. 243; 45 N.W. 923; 118 Mass. 295; 176 U.S. 599; 14 S.C. 494. 2. The statement filed July 1, 1903, did not comply with the law, because it was not signed and sworn to ......
  • Singhaus v. Piper, No. 20445.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Nebraska
    • 3 Mayo 1919
    ...statute for claims that accrued before the corporation was in default for the notice. Smith v. Steele, 8 Neb. 115;Howell Bros. v. Roberts, 29 Neb. 483, 45 N. W. 923;Porter v. Sherman County Banking Co., 36 Neb. 271, 54 N. W. 424;Gorder v. Plattsmouth Canning Co., 36 Neb. 548, 54 N. W. 830. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Globe Publishing Company v. State Bank of Nebraska at Crete, 5538
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Nebraska
    • 6 Junio 1894
    ...not provide for the recovery of a penalty. (Anderson's Dictionary of Law; Sutherland, Statutory Construction, sec. 208; Howell v. Roberts, 29 Neb. 483; Coy v. Jones, 30 Neb. 798.) Section 136 is a part of the charter of the Globe Publishing Company. (Abbott v. Omaha Smelting Co., 4 Neb. 416......
  • Globe Pub. Co. v. State Bank of Nebraska at Crete
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Nebraska
    • 6 Junio 1894
    ...a violation of the law, and is penal. 10. Abbott v. Smelting Co., 4 Neb. 416, and White v. Blum, Id. 555, reaffirmed. Howell v. Roberts, 45 N. W. 923, 29 Neb. 483, and Coy v. Jones, 47 N. W. 208, 30 Neb. 798, overruled. 11. Where persons attempt, in good faith, to incorporate themselves int......
  • Howell Bros. v. Roberts
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Nebraska
    • 6 Mayo 1890
    ...45 N.W. 923 29 Neb. 483 HOWELL BROS. v. ANNA M. ROBERTS ET AL Supreme Court of NebraskaMay 6, ERROR to the district court for Harlan county. Tried below before GASLIN, J. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Morning & Keester, for plaintiff in error: The liability is intended as a means of redress for cr......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT