HSBC Mortg. Servs. v. Talip
| Decision Date | 27 November 2013 |
| Parties | HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES, respondent, v. Iqbal TALIP, et al., appellants, et al., defendants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Alice A. Nicholson, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellants.
Fein, Such & Crane, LLP, Syracuse, N.Y. , for respondent.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Iqbal Talip and Jessica Pooran appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), entered February 3, 2011, as denied those branches of their motion which were to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court entered September 24, 2010, upon their default in appearing or answering the complaint, and to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them based on the plaintiff's alleged failure to comply with the notice requirements of RPAPL 1304, and (2) an order of the same court entered October 3, 2011, as denied those branches of their motion which were for leave to renew those branches of their prior motion which were to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale entered September 24, 2010, and to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them based on the plaintiff's alleged failure to comply with the notice requirements of RPAPL 1304.
ORDERED that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the appellants' motion which were to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale, entered upon their default in appearing or answering the complaint, and to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them based on the plaintiff's alleged failure to comply with the notice requirements of RPAPL 1304. Contrary to the appellants' contention, they failed to establish that the default judgment should be vacated in the interests of substantial justice ( see Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 N.Y.2d 62, 68, 760 N.Y.S.2d 727, 790 N.E.2d 1156; Mortgage Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. v. Dort–Relus, 107 A.D.3d 861, 862, 968 N.Y.S.2d 117; Pritchard v. Curtis, 101 A.D.3d 1502, 1504–1505, 957 N.Y.S.2d 440).
The Supreme Court also properly denied those branches of the appellants' motion which were for leave to renew those branches of their prior motion which were to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale and to dismiss...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Joseph M. Guarino, Teresa Guarino, E-Loan, Inc.
...require ( see Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 N.Y.2d 62, 68, 760 N.Y.S.2d 727, 790 N.E.2d 1156 [2002]; HSBC Mtge. Serv. v. Talip, 111 A.D.3d 889, 975 N.Y.S.2d 887 [2d Dept. 2013]; Mortgage Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. v. Dort–Relus, 107 A.D.3d 861, 968 N.Y.S.2d 117 [2d Dept. 2013]; U.......
-
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Deserio
...130 AD3d 703, supra; see also Citimortgage v. Baser, ––– AD3d ––––, 2016 WL 802996 [2d Dept 2016] ; HSBC Mortgage Services v. Talip, 111 AD3d 889, 975 N.Y.S.2d 887 [2d Dept 2013] ). This result is dictated by the non-jurisdictional nature of a defense premised upon non-compliance with statu......
-
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Choo
...153 A.D.3d at 758, 60 N.Y.S.3d 320 ; HSBC Bank USA v. Josephs–Byrd, 148 A.D.3d at 790, 49 N.Y.S.3d 477; HSBC Mtge. Servs. v. Talip, 111 A.D.3d 889, 890, 975 N.Y.S.2d 887 ; cf. Nationscredit Fin. Servs. Corp. v. Atherley, 91 A.D.3d 922, 922, 937 N.Y.S.2d 603 ).In light of our determination, ......
-
Summitbridge Credit Invs., LLC v. Wallace
...justice (see Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 N.Y.2d 62, 68, 760 N.Y.S.2d 727, 790 N.E.2d 1156 ; HSBC Mtge. Servs. v. Talip, 111 A.D.3d 889, 890, 975 N.Y.S.2d 887 ; Mortgage Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. v. Dort–Relus, 107 A.D.3d 861, 862, 968 N.Y.S.2d 117 ).The parties' remaining conte......