Hubbard v. Texas County
Decision Date | 16 June 1890 |
Citation | 13 S.W. 1065,101 Mo. 210 |
Parties | HUBBARD v. TEXAS COUNTY. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Texas county; C. C. BLAND, Judge.
A. H. Livingston and J. D. Young, for appellant. V. M. Hines, for respondent.
The plaintiff presented to the county court for allowance the following demand: Houston, Mo., February 14th, 1887. Texas County, in account with S. M. Hubbard, County Clerk, Dr. 1887. Feb. 4 & 5. To filing 3,319 assessment lists, at .05 each, $165.95. The county court refused to allow the demand, and the plaintiff appealed to the circuit court. On the trial in the circuit court, the court declared the law to be "that the plaintiff is not entitled to any fee for filing and preserving the assessment lists delivered to him by the assessor," and rendered judgment for the defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals to this court. By the revenue law (Rev. St. 1879, c. 145, § 6688) it is provided that the assessment lists "shall be by the assessor, after he has completed his assessor's books, filed in the office of the county clerk, and by him, after entering the filing of the same thereon, be preserved and safely kept." By section 6862 of the same chapter it is provided that ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
American Constitution Fire Assur. Co. v. Robertson
... ... Supreme Court, the Circuit Court of Cole County was without ... jurisdiction at a subsequent term to entertain or enter any ... order, decree or ... Mo.App. 490, 279 S.W. 195; Railroad v. Boswell, 104 ... Tenn. 529, 58 S.W. 117; Hubbard v. Texas County, 101 ... Mo. 210, 13 S.W. 1065. The statute must be strictly ... construed ... ...
-
American Const. Fire Assur. Co. v. Robertson
...638; King v. Riverland Levee Dist., 218 Mo. App. 490, 279 S.W. 195; Railroad v. Boswell, 104 Tenn. 529, 58 S.W. 117; Hubbard v. Texas County, 101 Mo. 210, 13 S.W. 1065. The statute must be strictly construed. State ex rel. Troll v. Brown, 146 Mo. 406. His compensation attaches as an inciden......
-
King v. Maries County
... ... with all the necessary machinery for its execution ... Harris v. Buffington, 28 Mo. 53; Hubbard v. Texas ... County, 101 Mo. 212 ... F. H ... Farris and Gove & Davidson for respondent ... (1) ... ...
-
King v. Maries County
...system prescribing service, and providing compensation for such service, and such compensation is necessarily exclusive. Hubbard v. Texas Co., 101 Mo. 210; Harris v. Buffington, 28 Mo. Since this controversy arose, the Legislature has by express enactment authorized any collector to employ ......