Hubbert v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.
Decision Date | 28 October 1918 |
Docket Number | (No. 206.) |
Citation | 206 S.W. 69 |
Parties | HUBBERT et al. v. MISSOURI PAC. R. CO. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; J. S. Lake, Judge.
Action by C. B. Hubbert and another against the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
Appellants, pro se. E. B. Kinsworthy and R. E. Wiley, both of Little Rock, for appellee.
It is insisted by appellee that the judgment should be affirmed, because appellants have made no abstract or abridgment of the transcript, in compliance with rule 9 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas. That part of rule 9 referred to by appellee is as follows:
* * *"
In an attempt to abstract this case, appellants gave their own version of the facts in the case, not connecting them with the testimony of any witness in the case. Concerning the pleadings, they state that they filed suit in the Pike county circuit court, July, 1917, to be tried September term, 1917, against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company, B. F. Bush, receiver, and the Missouri Pacific Railway Company; that the defendants filed their answer to complaint at the September term of the Pike county circuit court, 1917, and, among other things, alleged the sale and transfer of said railways to the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company; that the appellants filed a motion to amend their complaint, making the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company party defendants, which was granted; that on the 19th day of January, 1918, appellants filed their amended complaint; that at the March term of the Pike county circuit court, 1918, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the suit for want of jurisdiction; that the court, at the March term, 1918, after hearing the motion, dismissed the suit; that appellants excepted to the finding of the court and to the judgment, and asked that exceptions be noted of record, which was done; and that they prayed an appeal to the Supreme Court, which was granted.
It will be observed that the...
To continue reading
Request your trial