Hudson v. Petrosurance Inc
| Decision Date | 29 November 2010 |
| Docket Number | 2009-1816 |
| Citation | 2010 Ohio 4505,127 Ohio St.3d 54 |
| Parties | Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
The official versions of the opinions listed below, which were previously released as slip opinions, have been published in the November 29, 2010 Ohio Official Reports advance sheet. These opinions should now be cited using the Ohio Official Reports citation format.
To continue reading
Request your trial
214 cases
-
Taylor v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P.
...Assembly established “a comprehensive framework governing the liquidation of insurance companies operating in Ohio,” Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc., 127 Ohio St.3d 54, 2010-Ohio-4505, 936 N.E.2d 481, ¶ 16, through which the liquidator is empowered “to protect the rights of insureds, policyhol......
-
Argabrite v. Neer
...de novo—that is, we will consider the evidence as if for the first time—using the standard set out in Civ.R. 56. Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc., 127 Ohio St.3d 54, 2010-Ohio-4505, 936 N.E.2d 481, ¶ 29. A court may grant summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact remains to b......
-
Omega Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Koverman
...the evidence most strongly in favor of the nonmoving party, and that conclusion is adverse to the nonmoving party. Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc., 127 Ohio St.3d 54, 2010-Ohio-4505, 936 N.E.2d 481, ¶ 29 ; Sinnott v. Aqua–Chem, Inc., 116 Ohio St.3d 158, 2007-Ohio-5584, 876 N.E.2d 1217, ¶ 29. T......
-
Wayt v. DHSC, LLC
...the primary goal "is to ascertain and give effect to the intent of the legislature as expressed in the statute." Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc. , 127 Ohio St.3d 54, 2010-Ohio-4505, 936 N.E.2d 481, ¶ 30. "The first rule of statutory construction is to look at the statute's language to determin......
Request a trial to view additional results