Huffman v. Huffman

Decision Date10 May 2011
Citation2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 04001,923 N.Y.S.2d 583,84 A.D.3d 875
PartiesSharon HUFFMAN, respondent,v.John HUFFMAN, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

84 A.D.3d 875
923 N.Y.S.2d 583
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 04001

Sharon HUFFMAN, respondent,
v.
John HUFFMAN, appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

May 10, 2011.


[923 N.Y.S.2d 585]

Andrea Seychett Schear, Melville, N.Y., for appellant.Courten & Villar, P.L.L.C., Hauppauge, N.Y. (Dorothy A. Courten of counsel), for respondent.REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., MARK C. DILLON, L. PRISCILLA HALL, and SHERI S. ROMAN, JJ.

[84 A.D.3d 875] In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), entered August 27, 2009, as, after a nonjury trial, awarded the plaintiff 30% of the value of his master's degree, weekly child support in the sum of $1,281.14, and maintenance for four years commencing December 1, 2008, in the amounts of $5,000 per month for the first and second years, $3,500 per month for the third year, and $2,000 per month for the fourth year, and directed him to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $90,793.02 in connection with certain bonus money.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, (1) by deleting the provision thereof awarding the plaintiff maintenance for four years commencing December 1, 2008, in the amounts of $5,000 per month for the first and second years, $3,500 per month for the third year, and $2,000 per month for the fourth year, and substituting therefor a provision awarding the plaintiff maintenance for four years commencing November 11, 2004, the date the application for such maintenance was first made, in the amounts of $5,000 per month from November 11, 2004, through October 2006, $3,500 per month from November 2006 through October 2007, and $2,500 per month from November 2007 through October 2008, and (2) by deleting the provision thereof awarding the plaintiff the sum of $90,793.02 in connection with [84 A.D.3d 876] certain bonus money to the extent the award constitutes the defendant's 2004 bonus; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings, including appropriate recalculations in accordance herewith and the entry of an amended judgment thereafter.

The Supreme Court's determination of basic child support was proper. Since the actual combined parental income exceeded $80,000, the trial court, in its discretion, could apply either the applicable statutory percentage, in this case 29% for three children, or the factors set forth in Domestic Relations...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Spinner v. Spinner
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 4, 2020
    ...participating in housekeeping responsibilities (see Kim v. Schiller , 112 A.D.3d 671, 673–674, 978 N.Y.S.2d 229 ; Huffman v. Huffman , 84 A.D.3d 875, 877, 923 N.Y.S.2d 583 ; Jayaram v. Jayaram , 62 A.D.3d 951, 953, 880 N.Y.S.2d 305 ). Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the fact that th......
  • Weidman v. Weidman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 6, 2018
    ...and that her distributive award should be reduced by 15% to account for the plaintiff's income tax liability (see Huffman v. Huffman, 84 A.D.3d 875, 877, 923 N.Y.S.2d 583 ). Moreover, the plaintiff's contention 78 N.Y.S.3d 376 that the court engaged in "double counting" by distributing a po......
  • Mojdeh M. v. Jamshid A.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • July 4, 2012
    ...earning capacity it affords the holder” (O'Brien v. O'Brien, 66 N.Y.2d 576, 588, 498 N.Y.S.2d 743, 489 N.E.2d 712)” Huffman v. Huffman, 84 A.D.3d 875, 923 N.Y.S.2d 583 [2 Dept.,2011] ). Enhanced earning capacity is the present value, after tax, of the incremental income an individual earns ......
  • C.G. v. R.G.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • January 28, 2015
    ...was filed on December 5, 2005. Accordingly, the spousal maintenance awarded herein is retroactive to that date. See Huffman v. Huffman, 84 A.D.3d 875, 923 N.Y.S.2d 583 (2d Dept.2011).When calculating retroactive arrears Husband is entitled to a credit for maintenance payments made under the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • § 7.12 Other Employee Compensation and Fringe Benefits
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Divorce, Separation and the Distribution of Property Title CHAPTER 7 Property Acquired or Improved with Both Separate and Marital Property
    • Invalid date
    ...36, 623 N.Y.S.2d 527, 647 N.E.2d 749 (1995).[1039] Klauer v. Abeliovich, 149 A.D.3d 617, 53 N.Y.S.3d 37 (2017); Huffman v. Huffman, 923 N.Y.S.2d 583, 84 A.D.3d 875 (2011).[1040] Ropiecki v. Ropiecki, 94 A.D.3d 734, 941 N.Y.S.2d 650 (2012).[1041] Cuccia v. Cuccia, 90 So.3d 1228 (Miss. 2012).......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT