Hughes v. Chesser, 84-7033
| Decision Date | 30 April 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-7033,84-7033 |
| Parties | Donald Ray HUGHES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William CHESSER, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
Donald Ray Hughes, pro se.
Ronald C. Forehand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama.
Plaintiff, Donald Ray Hughes, applies for leave to file an in forma pauperis appeal from the district court's denial of his Sec. 1983 suit against a state probation officer, William Chesser.
Hughes alleges that Chesser falsified certain facts in his presentence report. The district court held that Chesser was immune from suit, quoting from Spaulding v. Nielsen, 599 F.2d 728 (5th Cir.1979) as follows:
The district court's dismissal of Spaulding's damage claims against the federal probation officers was proper. Judges who act within the scope of their authority enjoy absolute immunity from damage suits. Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 98 S.Ct. 1099, 55 L.Ed.2d 331 (1978); Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 87 S.Ct. 1213, 18 L.Ed.2d 288 (1967). This immunity has been extended to prosecutors for their decision to prosecute and their conduct of the government's case on the theory that these activities are 'intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process ...' Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 96 S.Ct. 984, 47 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976). We hold that a probation officer is entitled to the same protection when preparing and submitting a presentence report in a criminal case. The report is an integral part of the sentencing process, and in preparing the report the probation officer acts at the direction of the court. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 32. We think it apparent that this narrow function is 'intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process' and thus, where, as here, the challenged activities of a federal probation officer are within this function, he or she is absolutely immune from a civil suit for damages. Burkes v. Callion, 433 F.2d 318 (9th Cir.1970); Friedman v. Younger, 282 F.Supp. 710 (C.D.Cal.1968). See also Cruz v. Skelton, 502 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir.1974). Defendants' activities were within this protected function, and the complaint seeking damages was properly dismissed.
599 F.2d at 729 (footnotes omitted).
The Fifth Circuit case decided before October 1, 1981 is binding precedent in this circuit. Bonner v. City of Prichard,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dorman v. Simpson
...57 L.Ed.2d 895 (1978); Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 96 S.Ct. 984, 47 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976); Dorman, 821 F.2d at 138; Hughes v. Chesser, 731 F.2d 1489 (11th Cir.1984) (recognizing Spaulding as precedent and extending its coverage also to provide absolute immunity for state probation office......
-
J.A.W. v. State
...cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1028, 108 S.Ct. 755, 98 L.Ed.2d 767 (1988); Demoran v. Witt, 781 F.2d 155, 157 (9th Cir.1986); Hughes v. Chesser, 731 F.2d 1489 (11th Cir.1984). When preparing pre-sentence reports, probation officers act at the specific request of the court and submit the results of ......
-
Duffy v. County of Bucks
...cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1028, 108 S.Ct. 755, 98 L.Ed.2d 767 (1988); Demoran v. Witt, 781 F.2d 155, 158 (9th Cir.1985); Hughes v. Chesser, 731 F.2d 1489, 1490 (11th Cir.1984); Spaulding v. Nielsen, 599 F.2d 728, 729 & 729 n. 2 (5th ...
-
Cooney v. Park County
...Cir.1970); Friedman v. Younger, 282 F.Supp. 710 (C.D.Cal.1968) (also extending absolute immunity to district attorneys); Hughes v. Chesser, 731 F.2d 1489 (11th Cir.1984), Shelton v. McCarthy, 699 F.Supp. 412 (W.D.N.Y.1988). The Shelton court identified three factors which justify absolute i......
-
The Officer Has No Robes: a Formalist Solution to the Expansion of Quasi-judicial Immunity
...Supp. 2d 1322, 1330 (D. Utah 1998) (holding absolute immunity applied to the preparation of a presentence report).240. Hughes v. Chesser, 731 F.2d 1489, 1490 (11th Cir. 1984); see also Holmes v. Crosby, 418 F.3d 1256, 1258 (11th Cir. 2005) (citing Chesser favorably).241. Turner v. Barry, 85......
-
Civil Suits for Civil Rights: a Primer on Section 1983
...Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335, 339-40 (1986). 100. 784 F.2d 345, 347-48 (10th Cir. 1986). 101. Id. at 348. Accord, Hughes v. Chesser, 731 F.2d 1489, 1490 (11th Cir. 102. Bruning, supra, note 74 at 356-57; DeLoach v. Bevers, 922 F.2d 618, 621-23 (10th Cir. 1990). 103. Valdez, supra, note 91......