Hughes v. Sikes
Decision Date | 07 May 2001 |
Docket Number | No. S01A0144.,S01A0144. |
Citation | 273 Ga. 804,546 S.E.2d 518 |
Parties | HUGHES v. SIKES. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Jeffery Hughes, Pro Se.
Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Paula K. Smith, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Tammie J. Philbrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
OCGA § 5-6-48(f). Consistent with these enactments, we have consistently "follow[ed] the route ... toward less technical and more expeditious handling of cases involving minor procedural errors." Steele v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 252 Ga. 58, 59-60, 311 S.E.2d 470 (1984).
The habeas court clerk's duty to file a notice of appeal is ministerial in nature, and it was beyond her duty or power to concern herself with the legal viability of a notice presented to her for filing. See Orr v. Culpepper, 161 Ga.App. 801, 804, 288 S.E.2d 898 (1982). By rejecting...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Capote v. Ray
...both a notice of appeal and an application for a certificate of probable cause....' [Cit.]" (Emphasis in original.) Hughes v. Sikes, 273 Ga. 804(1), 546 S.E.2d 518 (2001). See also Fullwood v. Sivley, 271 Ga. 248, 517 S.E.2d 511 (1999). This Court relaxed the statutory time requirements whe......
-
State v. Brown
...to determine whether such filing is sufficient to invoke its jurisdiction.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Hughes v. Sikes, 273 Ga. 804, 805(1), 546 S.E.2d 518 (2001). Thus, we owe no deference to the trial court's analysis of whether the State's notice of appeal from the court's evide......
-
Duke v. State, S19M0969
...to determine whether such filing is sufficient to invoke its jurisdiction." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Hughes v. Sikes , 273 Ga. 804, 805 (1), 546 S.E.2d 518 (2001) (interpreting current OCGA § 5-6-30 ). Such authority has been used to determine, for instance, that an appellant nee......
-
Jones v. Peach Trader Inc.
...v. Stephens , 291 Ga. 79, 727 S.E.2d 484 (2012) ; Lamb v. Salvation Army , 301 Ga. App. 325, 687 S.E.2d 615 (2009) ; Hughes v. Sikes , 273 Ga. 804, 546 S.E.2d 518 (2001) ; Azar v. Baird , 232 Ga. 81, 205 S.E.2d 273 (1974). But our cases have also generated some confusion on that question by......
-
Wills, Trusts & Administration of Estates - Mary F. Radford
...521. Former O.C.G.A. section 53-3-6(b) (1997) required the presumption of revocation to be overcome by clear and convincing evidence. 72. 273 Ga. at 804, 546 S.E.2d at 522. 73. See, e.g., the cases discussed at radford, supra note 3, at 263. 74. O.C.G.A. Sec. 53-2-3(1) (1997). 75. Id. 76. I......