Hughes v. Wasik
| Decision Date | 02 February 1996 |
| Citation | 637 N.Y.S.2d 556,224 A.D.2d 982 |
| Parties | Matter of Susan M. HUGHES, Respondent, v. Lawrence WASIK, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Hartley, J.--Modify Support.
Michael P. Smith, Fredonia, for appellant.
Carol A. Condon, Buffalo, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
Respondent father appeals from an order of Family Court granting the application of petitioner mother for upward modification of child support from $60 per week, as established by the parties' 1979 separation agreement, to $178.93 pursuant to the Child Support Standards Act (CSSA). Respondent contends that the court erred in making a finding of fact contrary to an apparent finding of the Hearing Examiner and in increasing child support.
We conclude that the court properly made its own findings of fact pursuant to its authority to review the order of the Hearing Examiner (see, Family Ct Act § 439[e][ii] ). We also conclude that Family Court properly found a basis for upward modification of child support based on the insufficiency of the prior support arrangement to meet the needs of the children (see, Matter of Brescia v. Fitts, 56 N.Y.2d 132, 451 N.Y.S.2d 68, 436 N.E.2d 518; Matter of Barnes v. Barnes, 186 A.D.2d 1042, 590 N.Y.S.2d 774; Matter of Sutton v. Sutton, 178 A.D.2d 980, 981, 578 N.Y.S.2d 752). Petitioner demonstrated that the death of her husband, who had been helping to support respondent's children, and the increase in the food, clothing, medical, transportation, and educational needs of the children, have rendered her unable to meet the expenses of the household. Petitioner demonstrated modest needs of approximately $2,600 per month, and income, including Social Security survivors' benefits and imputed income from investment of life insurance proceeds, totaling only about $2,000 per month. The deficit has forced petitioner to borrow to pay for funeral and living expenses since her husband's death (see, Matter of Clate v. Clate, 199 A.D.2d 1064, 605 N.Y.S.2d 608, lv. denied 83 N.Y.2d 756, 613 N.Y.S.2d 128, 635 N.E.2d 297). Based on the proof of unmet needs, a de novo determination of respondent's child support obligation, in accordance with the CSSA, was warranted (see, Family Ct Act § 413[1][l]; Matter of Tapp v. Tapp, 202 A.D.2d 679, 612 N.Y.S.2d 873).
Order unanimously affirmed with costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In the Matter of A Proceeding For Paternity v. Andre N.
...upon the Court's independent review of the record ( see, Winters v. Winters, 154 A.D.2d 884, 545 N.Y.S.2d 956; Matter of Hughes v. Wasik, 224 A.D.2d 982, 637 N.Y.S.2d 556; Matter of Baker v. Rose, 23 A.D.3d 1112, 1113, 804 N.Y.S.2d 885), and giving due deference to the credibility determina......
-
T.M. v. J.K.
...own findings of fact even though the findings may be contrary to the findings of the support magistrate (Matter of Hughes v. Wasik, 224 A.D.2d 982, 637 N.Y.S.2d 556 [4th Dept.1996] ). Here, this court elects to make new findings of fact and issue an order without holding a new hearing.FINDI......
-
Boyer v. Boyer
...with or without holding a new hearing, his * * * own findings of fact and order" (Family Ct.Act § 439[e][ii]; see, Matter of Hughes v. Wasik, 224 A.D.2d 982, 637 N.Y.S.2d 556; Matter of Lucille Ann D. v. David F.K., 219 A.D.2d 874, 875, 632 N.Y.S.2d 909). The court properly concluded that t......
-
R.S. v. A.P.
...can properly make its own findings of fact even though they may be contrary to those of the support magistrate (Matter of Hughes v. Wasik, 224 A.D.2d 982 [4th Dept 1996] ). Here, this court elects to make new findings of fact and issue an order without holding a new hearing.In accord with t......