Hull v. Floyd S. Pike Elec. Contractor, Inc.

Decision Date04 October 1983
Docket NumberNo. 8217SC1105,8217SC1105
Citation307 S.E.2d 404,64 N.C.App. 379
CourtNorth Carolina Court of Appeals
PartiesTerry Clinton HULL v. FLOYD S. PIKE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, INC.

C. Orville Light, Madison, for plaintiff-appellant.

Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter by J. Donald Cowan, Jr. and Jeri L. Whitfield, Greensboro, for defendant-appellee.

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint. Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 176 S.E.2d 161 (1970). A complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief. Id. The complaint should be liberally construed. Benton v. Construction Co., 28 N.C.App. 91, 220 S.E.2d 417 (1975). Dismissal is proper only when: (1) the complaint on its face reveals that no law supports plaintiff's claim; (2) the complaint reveals on its face that some fact essential to plaintiff's claim is missing; or (3) some fact disclosed in the complaint defeats the plaintiff's claim. Advertising Co. v. City of Charlotte, 50 N.C.App. 150, 272 S.E.2d 920 (1980). Since plaintiff, here, has brought a claim under a specific statute, the question before this Court is whether plaintiff has alleged facts supporting application of the law.

To allege a cause of action under G.S. 97-6.1, plaintiff must have been demoted or discharged and such demotion or discharge must have occurred because plaintiff, in good faith, instituted or caused to be instituted a proceeding under the North Carolina Worker's Compensation Act, or testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding. Plaintiff's complaint stated that plaintiff had been advised by defendant that there was no work for him and that he would be put on temporary layoff. Had plaintiff's complaint alleged only these facts, dismissal would have been proper since plaintiff would not have established a prima facie case of retaliatory discharge. Plaintiff's complaint, however, contained a subsequent allegation that "plaintiff is informed and believes that he is now considered on permanent layoff and that [he] has been demoted or discharged within the meaning of North Carolina General Statute 97-6.1." We think this allegation contains sufficient facts to withstand a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6).

The purpose of the complaint is to give the defendant notice of the wrong to which plaintiff complains. See Jones v. City of Greensboro, 51 N.C.App. 571, 277 S.E.2d 562 (1...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Johnson v. Bollinger
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • June 2, 1987
    ...was a motion for a more definite statement. N.C.R.Civ.P. 12(e). Smith, 79 N.C.App. at 529, 339 S.E.2d at 851; Hull v. Pike, 64 N.C.App. 379, 381, 307 S.E.2d 404, 406 (1983). We note that motions for a more definite statement may frequently be interposed for delay and should be scrutinized w......
  • Fagundes v. Ammons Dev. Grp., Inc.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • September 4, 2018
    ...can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief." See Hull v. Floyd S. Pike Electrical Contractor, 64 N.C. App. 379, 380, 307 S.E.2d 404, 406 (1983) (citation omitted) (emphasis added). Accordingly, we conclude the trial court improperly dismissed Plainti......
  • Abels v. Renfro Corp.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • December 1, 1992
    ...compensation proceedings or by her testimony or her anticipated testimony in those proceedings. Hull v. Floyd S. Pike Electrical Contractor, 64 N.C.App. 379, 307 S.E.2d 404 (1983). Plaintiff provided sufficient evidence at trial to withstand the judgment n.o.v. motion. At trial, plaintiff i......
  • Banks v. Hunter
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • January 17, 2017
    ... ... Thomasville Motors, Inc. , 244 N.C. 84, 90, 92 S.E.2d 673, 678 (1956) ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT