Hull. v. Hoilloway
Decision Date | 30 October 1889 |
Citation | 20 A. 445,58 Conn. 210 |
Parties | HULL. v. HOILLOWAY et al. |
Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Error from superior court, New London county.
H. A. Hull, for plaintiff. It. Wheeler, for defendant G. E. Holloway. A. Brandegee, for defendants G. E. Holloway, Jr., and Vera G. Holloway.
This action is brought by the trustee under the will of Mary E. Holloway, deceased, to obtain for his guidance a construction of certain clauses of the will. The part of the will giving rise to the questions in the case is as follows: The property covered by the trust is a piece of real estate situated in the city of New London, and subject to a mortgage. The beneficiaries under the trust are Gideon E. Holloway, husband of the testatrix, Gideon E. Holloway, Jr., her son, and Vera G. Holloway, her granddaughter. The trustee, in his complaint, propounds the following questions: (1) What authority said trustee has to sell said real estate, and under what restrictions he must act. (2) What money or proceeds of said sale said trustee can lawfully pay to said Gideon E. Holloway under said will. (3) Whether said Gideon E. Holloway has the unqualified right to demand of said trustee a. sale, and the payment to him of the whole or any part of the proceeds of said sale, or a conveyance of said real estate to him. (4) Whether said trustee is to exercise his personal discretion as to the needs and requirements of said Gideon E. Holloway, and in paying money to said Holloway on his request under said will. (5) What money or proceeds of sale of said land said trustee can pay to said Gideon E. Holloway, Jr., under said will, and what rights he has to said money or proceeds during the life of his father. (6) What money or proceeds of sale of said land said trustee can pay to said Vera G. Holloway, and what rights she has to said money or proceeds during the lives of her father and grandfather. (7) Whether said trustee is authorized or directed to transfer said real estate or the proceeds to said Gideon E. Holloway upon his simple request in writing, or whether said trustee shall first be satisfied in the exercise of his own discretion that said Holloway actually requires the same for his necessary uses and personal maintenance and support.
All parties in interest agree that it is for the advantage of the beneficiaries that the property he sold, and, Gideon E. Holloway having consented in writing to the sale, it becomes the duty of the trustee, under a proper order of the court of probate, to sell the property, and convert the proceeds of the sale into a trust fund, to be held for the purposes named in the will. This disposes of the first question proposed.
The main questions of the case involve the rights of Gideon E. Holloway, Sr., in the trust fund, and are suggested by the following ambiguous language contained in one clause of the will, a construction of which will afford a general answer ton early all the questions presented. This clause reads as follows: "I direct that said trustee shall from time to time pay and transfer and convey to my said...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Eastman v. School Dist. No. 1 of Lewis and Clark County
...requires a friend' means 'he needs a friend.' Thus the verb 'required' in its ordinary sense, means to have need of. In Hull v. Holloway, 58 Conn. 210, 20 A. 445, 447, court said the word 'require' is 'frequently and correctly used in the sense of 'to need' or 'to be requisite,' and we adop......
-
Murdoch v. Murdoch
... ... Lillibrige, 73 Conn. 655, 49 A. 21; Peckham v ... Leggo, 57 Conn. 553, 19 A. 392, 7 L. R. A. 419, 14 Am ... St. Rep. 130; Hull v. Holloway, 58 Conn. 218, 20 A ... 445; Glover v. Stillson, 56 Conn. 316, 15 A. 752; ... Kent v. Morrison, 153 Mass. 137, 26 N.E. 427, L. R ... ...
-
In re Robinson's Will
...as to render our services unnecessary. In reaching this conclusion, we are only adopting the attitude of the court in Hull v. Holloway, 58 Conn. 210, 20 A. 445, 446—a case much relied upon by the hospital—wherein the clause under consideration was in much the same terms as the one before us......
-
In re Clara S. Robinson's Will
... ... our services unnecessary. In reaching this conclusion, we are ... only adopting the attitude of the court in Hull v ... Holloway, 58 Conn. 210, 20 A. 445, 446--a case much ... relied upon by the hospital--wherein the clause under ... consideration was in much ... ...