Humphrey v. State, 88-02558
Decision Date | 10 May 1991 |
Docket Number | No. 88-02558,88-02558 |
Citation | 16 Fla. L. Weekly 1298,579 So.2d 335 |
Parties | 16 Fla. L. Weekly 1298 Neil HUMPHREY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Elaine L. Thompson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Appellant, Neil Humphrey, Jr., appeals the judgment and sentences rendered against him for racketeering and conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. We find no error except in regard to his sentence. Appellant was sentenced pursuant to a plea agreement to three-and-one-half years in prison followed by two years probation for racketeering, and a concurrent ten years in prison followed by two years probation for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. A probationary term that falls between or interrupts an incarcerative sentence or sentences is illegal. Schlosser v. State, 554 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Gill v. State, 550 So.2d 72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Appellant's two-year probation sentence for racketeering that would precede the completion of the concurrent ten-year prison sentence for conspiracy is such an illegal sentence and is, therefore, reversed and this case remanded for resentencing consistent with this opinion.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Walker v. State
...words, "[a] probationary term that falls between or interrupts an incarcerative sentence or sentences is illegal." Humphrey v. State, 579 So.2d 335, 336 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). See also Barr v. State, 474 So.2d 417, 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Cox v. State, 468 So.2d 437 (Fla. 2d DCA This is becaus......
-
Elliott v. State, 5D08-3465.
...falling between or interrupting incarcerative sentences. Horner v. State, 617 So.2d 311, 312 (Fla.1993) (quoting Humphrey v. State, 579 So.2d 335, 336 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)). We do not address this aspect of Elliott's sentence as it was not raised for our ...
-
Horner v. State
...completed before the non-incarcerative portions begin. See, e.g., Mitchell v. State, 594 So.2d 823 (Fla. 1st DCA1992); Humphrey v. State, 579 So.2d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA1991); Sanchez v. State, 538 So.2d 923 (Fla. 5th DCA1989). "A probationary term that falls between or interrupts an incarcerati......
-
Beckner v. State, 91-01892
...five year prison term. A trial court is not authorized to impose intermittent periods of incarceration and probation. Humphrey v. State, 579 So.2d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). The trial court is to modify the sentences to insure that the probationary terms immediately succeed the incarcerative p......