Hunt v. Carroll
Decision Date | 19 June 1941 |
Docket Number | No. 3862.,3862. |
Citation | 157 S.W.2d 429 |
Parties | HUNT v. CARROLL et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Colorado County; Lester Holt, Judge.
Suit by Laura Belle Carroll, joined by her husband, Hulen R. Carroll, Jr., against Ben B. Hunt, independent executor, for judgment annulling and suspending the provisions of the last will and testament of Horace H. Hunt, deceased. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appealed to the Galveston Court of Civil Appeals, and the Supreme Court transferred the case to the Beaumont Court of Civil Appeals.
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
Powell, Rauhut & Gideon, of Austin, and Miller & Rutta, of Columbus, for appellant.
R. A. Weinert, of Seguin, and Vinson, Elkins, Weems & Francis, Tarlton Morrow, and Charles I. Francis, all of Houston, for appellees.
This suit was instituted in county court of Colorado county by appellee, Mrs. Laura Belle Carroll, joined by her husband, Hulen R. Carroll, Jr., under the provisions of Articles 3433, 3434, 3435, R.C.S.1925, praying for judgment annulling and suspending the provisions of the last will and testament of Horace H. Hunt, executed on the 4th day of May, 1937. The testator died in Colorado county on May 31, 1938, and his will was duly admitted to probate. This suit was instituted by appellees as a proceeding in the probate of the will. We here give the will in haec verba:
Know All Men by These Presents:
Appellees alleged, generally, the following grounds for annulling the will of Horace H. Hunt, as admitted to probate: (1) that the will is void because it is conflicting and unintelligible; (2) that it is contrary to public policy and void because it was intended to bring about a divorce; (3) that its provisions are contrary to the rule against perpetuities; and (4) that the independent executor named in the will (a brother of testator) may, in certain events, personally receive a share of the estate under Items 7 and 8, which disqualifies him to perform faithfully the duties incumbent on him under Item 7,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Young
...on other grounds, McMullen v. Sims, Tex.Com.App., 37 S.W.2d 141; Vogt v. Meyer, Tex.Civ.App., 169 S.W.2d 745 (1943); Hunt v. Carroll, Tex.Civ.App., 157 S.W.2d 429 (1941), error Insofar as the Will clearly segregates and treats the subject matter of bequests to beneficiaries under the age of......
-
Gurley v. Lindsley
...v. Schmidt, supra, 261 S.W.2d at 897. Gurley's equitable interest became vested at once. Kelly v. Womack, supra; Hunt v. Carroll, 157 S.W.2d 429 (Tex.Civ.App. 1941); Anderson v. Menefee, 174 S.W. 904 (Tex.Civ.App. 1915). The fact that full possession or enjoyment is postponed is immaterial ......
-
Long v. Long
...Court on other grounds, McMullen v. Sims, Tex.Com.App., 37 S.W.2d 141; Vogt v. Meyer, Tex.Civ.App., 169 S.W.2d 745; Hunt v. Carroll, Tex.Civ.App., 157 S.W.2d 429, error We think the general scheme of Dr. Long's will clearly expressed the intent to leave a life estate in his real estate to M......
-
ConocoPhillips Co. v. Koopmann
...interest. Peveto, 645 S.W.2d at 772. The interest may vest in interest before it vests in possession. See Hunt v. Carroll, 157 S.W.2d 429, 436 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1941, writ dism'd). A conveyance challenged under the rule against perpetuities must be "viewed as of the date the instrument......
-
What’s it mean to challenge the “validity” of a will and why does it matter?
...the testator’s dominant motive was to provide support for the beneficiary if the beneficiary became divorced or widowed. Hunt v. Carroll, 157 S.W.2d 429 (Tex. Civ. App.—Beaumont 1941, writ ref’d). Against this backdrop testator passed away. Shortly thereafter his will’s admitted to probate ......
-
Chapter 9-2 Creation and Validity of Texas Trusts
...Tex. Prop. Code § 112.009(c).[37] Tex. Prop. Code § 112.031.[38] Tex. Prop. Code § 112.031.[39] See, e.g., Hunt v. Carroll, 157 S.W.2d 429 (Tex. Civ. App.—Beaumont 1941) aff'd on other grounds, 168 S.W.2d 238 (Tex. Comm. App. 1943).[40] See Tex. Prop. Code § 112.031.[41] See Kopsombut-Myint......
-
Chapter 9-2 Creation and Validity of Texas Trusts
...Tex. Prop. Code § 112.009(c).[37] Tex. Prop. Code § 112.031.[38] Tex. Prop. Code § 112.031.[39] See, e.g., Hunt v. Carroll, 157 S.W.2d 429 (Tex. Civ. App.—Beaumont 1941) aff'd on other grounds, 168 S.W.2d 238 (Tex. Comm. App. 1943).[40] See Tex. Prop. Code § 112.031.[41] See Kopsombut-Myint......