Hunt v. Rabon

Decision Date03 December 1980
Docket NumberNo. 21342,21342
Citation275 S.C. 475,272 S.E.2d 643
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesJohn B. HUNT, Administrator of the Estate of Minnie Lee Hunt, and Trustee for the Benefit of John B. Hunt, Carlisle Smith, Linda Farmer and Brenda Graves, Appellant, v. Larry D. RABON, Betty Hemmingsen, Hemmingsen and Moseley, C.R.N.A., P.A., BruceHospital, Inc., Joe Doe, M.D., John H. Geanes, Willis Gregory, J.M. Thomason,Thomas Griffin, Joe Copeland, Saunders M. Bridges, John L. Bruce, William D.Tallevant,and Johnson-McCown Company, Inc., Defendants, of whom John H. Geanes, Willis Gregory, J.M. Thomason, Thomas Griffin, JoeCopeland, Saunders M. Bridges, John L. Bruce, William D. Tallevant, are theRespondents.

E. Crosby Lewis, of Lewis, Lewis & Robinson, Columbia, for appellant.

H. Grady Kirven, of Watkins, Vandiver, Kirven, Gable & Gray, Anderson, for respondents.

LITTLEJOHN, Justice:

According to the complaint in this action, Minnie Lee Hunt died during an operation at Bruce Hospital, Inc. Plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of the deceased, brings this action for injuries and for wrongful death arising out of the incident. The complaint alleged that Johnson-McCown Company, Inc. had erroneously installed a new medical gas system in the hospital by crossing the oxygen and nitrous oxide lines leading to the operating room. Defendants in the case are the attending surgeon, the nurse anesthetist, the professional corporation of the nurse anesthetist, Bruce Hospital, Inc., a John Doe, M.D., Johnson-McCown Company, Inc., the mechanical contractor company, and the eight named individuals who comprise the Board of Trustees of Bruce Hospital, Inc.

The eight hospital trustees demurred to the complaint on the ground that it failed to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action as to each of them individually as trustee. The circuit judge sustained the demurrer. The plaintiff has appealed.

The question presented, as taken from the plaintiff-appellant's brief, is as follows:

"Does Plaintiff's Complaint, state a cause of action against the individual members of the Board of Trustees of Bruce Hospital, upon which relief may be granted?"

The action is one in tort based on alleged negligence. While 23 specifications of negligence against the members of the board of trustees are set out in the complaint, we think that the brief of the plaintiff adequately summarizes the contentions of the complainant, when it said that the trustees

"... failed to hold meetings, failed to oversee any aspect of the hospital management, failed to confirm the inspection of such dangerous and complex equipment as the medical gas unit, and failed to insure that rules and regulations as prescribed by the State Board of Health, as well as their own rules and regulations, were complied with by the hospital staff."

Generally the reason for the creation of a corporation is to limit liability. While there are instances in which directors and/or trustees and officers may be personally liable, an officer or a director of a corporation is not, merely as a result of his standing as such, personally liable for torts of corporate employees. To incur liability he must ordinarily be shown to have in some way participated in or directed the tortious act. The allegations in the complaint linking the members of the board of trustees...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Arabi Gin Co. v. Plexus Cotton, Ltd. (In re, Joseph Walker & Co.)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of South Carolina
    • September 25, 2014
    ... ... 38 See Steinke v. Beach Bungee, Inc., 105 F.3d 192, 195 (4th Cir.1997); Hunt v. Rabon, 275 S.C. 475, 476–78, 272 S.E.2d 643, 643 (1980). Earlam and Kirby were not parties to the Ginner Contracts and, without more, Debtor's ... ...
  • Arabi Gin Co. v. Plexus Cotton, Ltd. (In re Joseph Walker & Co.)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of South Carolina
    • September 25, 2014
  • BPS, INC. v. Worthy
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • January 10, 2005
    ... ...         Worthy claims that as an officer of Carolina Benefit, he is immune from liability. He cites Hunt v. Rabon, 275 S.C. 475, 272 S.E.2d 643 (1980), for this proposition. In Hunt, the Supreme Court articulated: ... Generally the reason for the ... ...
  • Plowman v. Bagnal, 24090
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 19, 1993
    ... ... Hunt v ... Rabon, 275 S.C. 475, 272 S.E.2d 643 (1980). In accordance with this settled principle, we hold that in private actions under the UTPA, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT