Hunt v. Rabon
Decision Date | 03 December 1980 |
Docket Number | No. 21342,21342 |
Citation | 275 S.C. 475,272 S.E.2d 643 |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | John B. HUNT, Administrator of the Estate of Minnie Lee Hunt, and Trustee for the Benefit of John B. Hunt, Carlisle Smith, Linda Farmer and Brenda Graves, Appellant, v. Larry D. RABON, Betty Hemmingsen, Hemmingsen and Moseley, C.R.N.A., P.A., BruceHospital, Inc., Joe Doe, M.D., John H. Geanes, Willis Gregory, J.M. Thomason,Thomas Griffin, Joe Copeland, Saunders M. Bridges, John L. Bruce, William D.Tallevant,and Johnson-McCown Company, Inc., Defendants, of whom John H. Geanes, Willis Gregory, J.M. Thomason, Thomas Griffin, JoeCopeland, Saunders M. Bridges, John L. Bruce, William D. Tallevant, are theRespondents. |
E. Crosby Lewis, of Lewis, Lewis & Robinson, Columbia, for appellant.
H. Grady Kirven, of Watkins, Vandiver, Kirven, Gable & Gray, Anderson, for respondents.
According to the complaint in this action, Minnie Lee Hunt died during an operation at Bruce Hospital, Inc. Plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of the deceased, brings this action for injuries and for wrongful death arising out of the incident. The complaint alleged that Johnson-McCown Company, Inc. had erroneously installed a new medical gas system in the hospital by crossing the oxygen and nitrous oxide lines leading to the operating room. Defendants in the case are the attending surgeon, the nurse anesthetist, the professional corporation of the nurse anesthetist, Bruce Hospital, Inc., a John Doe, M.D., Johnson-McCown Company, Inc., the mechanical contractor company, and the eight named individuals who comprise the Board of Trustees of Bruce Hospital, Inc.
The eight hospital trustees demurred to the complaint on the ground that it failed to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action as to each of them individually as trustee. The circuit judge sustained the demurrer. The plaintiff has appealed.
The question presented, as taken from the plaintiff-appellant's brief, is as follows:
Generally the reason for the creation of a corporation is to limit liability. While there are instances in which directors and/or trustees and officers may be personally liable, an officer or a director of a corporation is not, merely as a result of his standing as such, personally liable for torts of corporate employees. To incur liability he must ordinarily be shown to have in some way participated in or directed the tortious act. The allegations in the complaint linking the members of the board of trustees...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Arabi Gin Co. v. Plexus Cotton, Ltd. (In re, Joseph Walker & Co.)
... ... 38 See Steinke v. Beach Bungee, Inc., 105 F.3d 192, 195 (4th Cir.1997); Hunt v. Rabon, 275 S.C. 475, 476–78, 272 S.E.2d 643, 643 (1980). Earlam and Kirby were not parties to the Ginner Contracts and, without more, Debtor's ... ...
- Arabi Gin Co. v. Plexus Cotton, Ltd. (In re Joseph Walker & Co.)
-
BPS, INC. v. Worthy
... ... Worthy claims that as an officer of Carolina Benefit, he is immune from liability. He cites Hunt v. Rabon, 275 S.C. 475, 272 S.E.2d 643 (1980), for this proposition. In Hunt, the Supreme Court articulated: ... Generally the reason for the ... ...
-
Plowman v. Bagnal, 24090
... ... Hunt v ... Rabon, 275 S.C. 475, 272 S.E.2d 643 (1980). In accordance with this settled principle, we hold that in private actions under the UTPA, ... ...