Hunter v. Johnson

Decision Date02 March 1989
Docket NumberNo. 46101,46101
Citation376 S.E.2d 371,259 Ga. 21
PartiesHUNTER et al. v. JOHNSON.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

David H. Tisinger, Tisinger, Tisinger, Vance & Greer, Carrollton, for Stephen C. Hunter et al.

Henry C. Custer, Custer & Phillips, Albany, Julian Webb, Donalsonville, for Allie Alday Johnson.

WELTNER, Justice.

Johnson filed a medical malpractice action against Hunter in January, 1987, alleging that because of negligent treatment in 1984, she suffered from chronic hip pain requiring repeated hospitalizations, including major surgery in October, 1985. The trial court denied Hunter's motion for summary judgment, in part based on a finding that the action was not barred by the statute of limitations of OCGA § 9-3-71. The court found the old (1976) statute unconstitutional as applied and that the new (1985) statute controlled. 1 We granted an interlocutory appeal to consider this issue.

1. Statutes of limitation look only to the remedy and so are procedural. George v. Gardner, 49 Ga. 441, 450 (1873); U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toombs County, 187 Ga. 544, 450, 1 S.E.2d 411 (1939).

2. Ordinarily, there is no constitutional impediment to giving retroactive effect to statutes that govern only procedure of the courts. Pritchard v. Savannah Railroad Co., 87 Ga. 294, 13 S.E. 493 (1891); 2 Allrid v. Emory University, 249 Ga. 35, 37, 285 S.E.2d 521 (1982).

3. However, there is no question of retroactivity here, as the amended (1985) version of OCGA § 9-3-71 was in effect at the time that the action was filed. There being no attack upon the validity of the amended statute, nothing in it compels the conclusion that the amended version should not apply to actions filed after its effective date.

4. As the alleged injury occurred within the times prescribed by the statute of limitations (OCGA § 9-3-71(a), and by the statute of repose, (OCGA § 9-3-71(b)), the action was filed timely.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

All the Justices concur.

1 OCGA § 9-3-71, 1976 version: "Except as otherwise provided in this article, an action for medical malpractice shall be brought within two years after the date on which the negligent or wrongful act or omission occurred."

OCGA § 9-3-71(a), 1985 version: "Except as otherwise provided in this article, an action for medical malpractice shall be brought within two years after the date on which the injury or death arising from a negligent or wrongful act or omission occurred."

2 " 'The presumption against a retrospective construction has no application to enactments which affect only the procedure and practice of the courts, even where the alteration which the statutes make has been disadvantageous to one of the parties.... A law which merely alters the procedure may, with perfect propriety, be made applicable to past as well as future...

To continue reading

Request your trial
30 cases
  • Harvey v. Merchan
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • June 21, 2021
    ...no constitutional impediment to giving retroactive effect to statutes that govern only procedure of the courts." Hunter v. Johnson , 259 Ga. 21, 22 (2), 376 S.E.2d 371 (1989). And we have specifically held that enacting a new limitation period that revives civil claims barred by a previous ......
  • Deal v. Coleman
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • November 18, 2013
    ...280 Ga. 333, 337(3), 626 S.E.2d 482 (2006) (same); Day v. Stokes, 268 Ga. 494, 495, 491 S.E.2d 365 (1997) (same); Hunter v. Johnson, 259 Ga. 21, 22(2), 376 S.E.2d 371 (1989) (“Ordinarily, there is no constitutional impediment to giving retroactive effect to statutes that govern only procedu......
  • Ethridge v. Price
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • December 5, 1989
    ...arose prior to the effective date of the waiver, not when the defendants' alleged negligence occurred. See also Hunter v. Johnson, 259 Ga. 21(3), 376 S.E.2d 371 (1989). 2. Either for the reason stated in the special concurrence of Judge Sognier or for the reason stated in the special concur......
  • Smith v. Suntrust Bank
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 8, 2014
    ...602(1), 726 S.E.2d 730 (2012). See Vaughn v. Vulcan Materials Co., 266 Ga. 163, 164(1), 465 S.E.2d 661 (1996); Hunter v. Johnson, 259 Ga. 21, 22(1) & (2), 376 S.E.2d 371 (1989). Moreover, neither party has pointed to any other law that would preclude the application of OCGA § 53–12–307(a) i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Torts - Cynthia Trimboli Adams and Charles R. Adams, Iii
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 46-1, September 1994
    • Invalid date
    ...259. Id. at 875, 434 S.E.2d at 720. 260. Id. The court based its holding in part upon an earlier supreme court decision, Hunter v. Johnson, 259 Ga. 21, 376 S.E.2d 371 (1989), which found that statutes of limitation were procedural (rather than substantive) in nature thereby creating no impe......
  • Creating a Civil Remedy in Georgia for Survivors of Out-of-state Childhood Sexual Abuse
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 73-5, July 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...equal protection rights under the federal and state constitutions. Harvey, 311 Ga. at 823-24, 860 S.E.2d at 573.86. Hunter v. Johnson, 259 Ga. 21, 22, 376 S.E.2d 371, 372 (1989) (citing Allrid v. Emory Univ., 249 Ga. 35, 37-38, 285 S.E.2d 521, 524 (1982); Pritchard v. Savannah R. Co., 87 Ga......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT