Hunter v. Pinnell

Citation193 Mo. 142,91 S.W. 472
PartiesHUNTER v. PINNELL.
Decision Date31 January 1906
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Missouri

Appeal from Circuit Court, New Madrid County; Hy. C. Riley, Judge.

Action by Lee Hunter against W. W. Pinnell. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Geo. H. Traylor, for appellant. Lawrence W. Fisher, for respondent.

BURGESS, P. J.

This is an action by plaintiff (appellant) against the defendant, both of whom claim title to the tract of land described in the petition, to ascertain and determine the estate, title, and interest of the parties, respectively, in such real estate. The suit is prosecuted under section 650, Rev. St. 1899. Both parties claim title in fee to said real estate; the plaintiff by derivative title from the government, and the defendant by reason of the 10 years' statute of limitations, under color of title. The petition is in due form. The answer denies plaintiff's title to the land, pleads the statute of limitations, and prays that defendant may be decreed the owner of the land, and that all other claimants claiming under and by virtue of any patent from New Madrid county, Mo., issued since 1865, be declared forever barred from setting up or maintaining any claim in deed to said premises, etc. The trial before the court resulted in a judgment and decree in favor of defendant, as prayed for in his answer. Plaintiff appeals.

The land in question is what is known as swamp land, and was patented to New Madrid county by the state of Missouri June 15, 1857, and by New Madrid county to the plaintiff, Lee Hunter, on the 8th day of October, 1901. Defendant claims color of title to the land, and title under the statute of limitations, and such color by reason of mesne conveyance from Albert...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Flinn v. Gillen
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 30 Julio 1928
    ...municipal powers. 2 C.J. 219; 37 C.J. 715; County of St. Charles v. Powell, 22 Mo. 525; Lumber Company v. Craig, 248 Mo. 319; Hunter v. Pinnell, 193 Mo. 142; Palmer v. Jones, 188 Mo. 163; Doniphan County v. Chouteau, 120 Mo. 577; Pendleton v. Perkins, 49 Mo. 565; City v. Duuham Towing Co., ......
  • Stonum v. Davis
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 3 Abril 1941
    ...1366, 1520, R.S. 1929; Simpson v. Stoddard County, 173 Mo. 421; Palmer v. Jones, 188 Mo. 163; Wilson v. Beckwith, 140 Mo. 359; Hunter v. Pinnell, 193 Mo. 142; Callahan v. Davis, 90 Mo. 78. (6) Plaintiff had a right of action in ejectment since the date of the sheriff's deeds in 1926, whethe......
  • Hecker v. Bleish
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 3 Marzo 1928
    ...Himmelberger-Harrison Lumber Co. v. Craig, 248 Mo. 319; McGrath v. City, 188 Mo. 102; Hemphill Lumber Co. v. Parker, 300 Mo. 568; Hunter v. Pinnell, 193 Mo. 142. Where possession is held, under color of title, of a part of a tract of land, in the name of the whole tract, such possession is ......
  • Hecker v. Bleish
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 3 Marzo 1928
    ... ... v. Craig, 248 Mo ... 319; McGrath v. City, 188 Mo. 102; Hemphill ... Lumber Co. v. Parker, 300 Mo. 568; Hunter v ... Pinnell, 193 Mo. 142. Where possession is held, under ... color of title, of a part of a tract of land, in the name of ... the whole ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT