Hunter v. State
Decision Date | 06 April 1892 |
Citation | 10 So. 730,29 Fla. 486 |
Parties | HUNTER v. STATE. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Error to criminal court of record, Duval county; H. B. PHILLIPS Judge.
Prosecution against Caesar Hunter for an assault with intent to rape. From a judgment on conviction defendant brings error. Reversed.
Syllabus by the Court
1. The gravamen of the offense in an indictment charging an assault with intent to rape is the intent with which the assault was made; and this question of intent, throughout the instructions of the court, should be kept prominently before the minds of the jury as being the main subject of their inquiry; and, if there be a reasonable doubt as to the intent, such doubt necessitates an acquittal.
2. The intent in such cases must be shown by the state to have so possessed the accused that his determination was to consummate the rape regardless of resistance and want of consent.
3. The manner, time, place, surroundings, and circumstances under which such an assault is made, and the want of opportunity to consummate the crime, are subjects of material consideration upon the question of intent.
4. The jury, being the sole and exclusive judges of the weight and credibility to be given to any and all evidence, have the right to disbelieve the evidence of an interested witness solely on the ground of interest.
COUNSEL John Wallace, for plaintiff in error.
William B. Lamar, Atty. Gen., for the State.
Caesar Hunter, the plaintiff in error, at the October term, 1891, of the criminal court of record for Duval county, victed of the charge of 'assault with intent to rape,' and, being sentenced to 10 years in the penitentiary, after refusal of his motion for new trial, brings his case here upon writ of error. As the evidence for the state is not voluminous, and as we have some comments to make upon its sufficiency for conviction, we will give it in full as it appears in the record.
Lucy Biggs, the prosecutrix, for the state testified as follows
Bartola Canova, for the state, testified:
William C. West, for the state, testified:
This comprises the entire evidence for the state.
The defendant introduced as a witness one Capt. Dennis, alias Dennis Jenkins, stated in the record to be a very black...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Neil
... ... gist--the gravamen--of the offense, and if lacking, a ... conviction cannot be upheld. ( Shell v. State (Tex. Cr ... App.), 38 S.W. 207; Gaskin v. State, 105 Ga ... 631, 31 S.E. 740; Clark & Farmer v. State, 39 Tex ... Cr. Rep. 152, 45 S.W. 696-701; Hunter v. State, 29 ... Fla. 486, 10 So. 730; Krum v. State, 19 Neb. 728, 28 ... N.W. 278; State v. Canada, 68 Iowa 397, 27 N.W. 288; ... Dunn v. State, 58 Neb. 807, 79 N.W. 719; People ... v. Fleming, 94 Cal. 308, 29 P. 647; People v ... Brown, 47 Cal. 447; Adams v. People, 179 Ill ... ...
-
State v. Wilson
...of the crime which, it is said, should be kept constantly before the jury's mind. 33 Cyc. 1432, 23 Eng. & Am. Ency. of Law 865; Hunter vs. State, 29 Fla. 486; 10 So. Sparkman vs. State, 84 Fla. 151, 92 So. 812; Curry vs. State, 4 Tex.Ct.App. 574; State vs. McCune, 16 Utah 170, 51 P. 818. In......
-
Ware v. State
...material or immaterial, is unworthy of belief. 37 Ark. 67; 30 P. 796. The second asked embodies the true rule. 80 Mo. 71; 17 S.W. 226; 10 So. 730; 49 N.W. 616; 19 S.W. 239; 10 P. 1 Starkie, Ev. 873; 15 Oh. St. 47; 45 N.W. 737; 44 id. 37; 2 Rice, Ev. p. 792; 7 Wheat. 293. 3. The fifth instru......
-
Hartley v. State
... ... create a reasonable doubt as to the truth of the evidence of ... such witness." ... The ... doctrine of reasonable doubt must be presented to the jury ... under our system of jurisprudence to properly present the ... issue of a criminal trial ... Hunter ... v. State (Florida), 10 So. 730 ... Eugene ... B. Ethridge, Assistant Attorney-General, for the state ... The ... verdict of the jury is supported by such evidence as warrants ... a finding of guilt and will not be cast aside by a court of ... appellate jurisdiction ... ...