Hunter v. Struggs

Decision Date16 November 1961
Docket NumberNo. 13823,13823
Citation352 S.W.2d 289
PartiesPearly HUNTER, Individually and as Guardian of the Estate of Dorothy Ann Murphy, a Minor, Appellant, v. Helen STRUGGS, Guardian of the Estate of Don Henry Hunter, a Minor, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

W. D. Avra, Houston, for appellant.

Russell T. Van Keuren, Don K. Townsend, Houston, for appellee.

BELL, Chief Justice.

Pearly Hunter, Individually and as Guardian of the Estate of Dorothy Ann Murphy, a Minor, sued Helen Struggs, Guardian of the Estate of Don Henry Hunter, a Minor, to establish ownership of Lot 74 in Block 3 of Carvers Terrace Addition in the City of Houston, and to thereby establish the right to the sum of $1,674.00 that was in the registry of the County Court at Law, this amount being the value paid in condemnation by the State of Texas for the property. Plaintiff's position was that she, Dorothy Ann Murphy and Don Henry Hunter (also known as Don Henry Johnson) each owned a one-third interest in the property at the time of condemnation and were each entitled to one-third of $1,674.00.

The court, in a trial without a jury, held that Don Henry Hunter was the sole owner of the property and was thus entitled to the total compensation paid for it.

John Hunter is the common source of title.

Before Hunter's marriage to Pearly, he executed a general warranty deed conveying the property to Don Henry Hunter, but reserving a life estate in himself. The date of this deed is October 5, 1951. Appellant attacks this deed by asserting it was not executed by Hunter or by his authority. Too, appellant says the deed was not valid because the notary who took the acknowledgment did not make a record of the acknowledgment as required by Article 5955, Vernon's Ann.Tex.St.

Appellant claims under a deed from Pearly and John Hunter executed August 21, 1954, which conveyed the fee to Dorothy Ann Murphy and Don Henry Hunter and reserved to the grantors a life estate. Pearly claims her one-third interest because of a life estate she would have in one-third of Hunter's property, which was his separate property.

The execution of the deed to appellee's ward, Don Henry Hunter, was proven by four witnesses who saw John Hunter sign the deed. Too, the notary who took the acknowledgment testified Helen Struggs brought the deed to him signed and that he required John Hunter to come before him. He then used ink eradicator to erase Hunter's name and had Hunter...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Martin v. Bane
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • December 12, 1969
    ...any way affect the validity of the instrument to which the certificate of acknowledgment is attached, Hunter v. Struggs, 352 S.W.2d 289 (Tex.Civ.App., Houston 1961, writ ref'd n.r.e.), and would not in our opinion constitute evidence of probative value to prove that the acknowledgment had i......
  • Kelley v. Southwestern Bell Media, Inc.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • January 28, 1988
    ...1969, no writ); Mills v. Snyder, 387 S.W.2d 954 (Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1965, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Hunter v. Struggs, 352 S.W.2d 289 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston 1961, writ ref'd n.r.e.). De minimis defects in pleadings do not render a default judgment invalid. See Stoner v. Thompson, 578 S.W.2d 679 T......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT