Hunter v. Wright
Decision Date | 20 January 1930 |
Docket Number | 7009. |
Citation | 152 S.E. 61,169 Ga. 840 |
Parties | HUNTER et al. v. WRIGHT, Comptroller General. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Motion to Rehear Denied March 1, 1930.
Syllabus by the Court.
The exemption of railroad ticket agents who may write accident insurance from the operation of the occupation taxes imposed by the General Tax Act of 1927 (Laws 1927, p. 56) is not such an exercise of the power of classification inherent in the General Assembly as can be held to be unreasonable or arbitrary, and therefore violative of article 1, § 2, par. 7 of the Constitution of this state. Nor is this exercise of the power of classification on the part of the General Assembly violative of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
The court did not err in refusing an injunction.
Error from Superior Court, Fulton County; E. E. Pomeroy, Judge.
Petition by N. A. Hunter and others against W. A. Wright, Comptroller General and ex officio Insurance Commissioner. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error. Affirmed.
Exemption of railroad ticket agents writing accident insurance from occupation taxes held not unconstitutional as unreasonable or arbitrary classification. General Tax Act 1927, p. 74, § 2 par. 58; Const. art. 1, § 2, par. 7.
On January 28, 1928, N. A. Hunter, L. O. Wright, A. J. Wright Rufus Pritchett, N. R. Glenn, L. Z. Gordon, J. T. Wilkerson, and C. F. Mitchell filed a petition seeking injunctive relief against the comptroller general and ex officio insurance commissioner of Georgia. The petition alleges that the petitioners are engaged in and carrying on the business of insurance agents; "that petitioners are respectively local agents, superintendents, managers, and solicitors for various industrial life and accident insurance companies, and this petition is filed in behalf of petitioners and of such other persons similarly situated as may elect to join herein." Part of the General Tax Act of 1927 (Ga. L. 1927, pp. 56, 74) is set forth as follows:
In the petition it is alleged, in substance, as follows: Petitioners are engaged in the insurance business, and their duties and positions bring them under the taxing provision, but do not bring them under either class of the exemptions set up in subparagraphs (f) and (g). The companies for which petitioners work have paid all corporation taxes and gross revenue taxes required of insurance companies. The provision "that this tax shall not apply to local insurance agents who adjust losses without remuneration" destroys the uniformity of operation of the tax imposed, and renders it unconstitutional because violative of paragraph 1 of section 2 of article 7 of the Constitution of Georgia, which declares that "all...
To continue reading
Request your trial